Supreme Court Rules Against EPA in Permitting Case Supported by NAHB

Legal
Published
Contact: Thomas Ward
[email protected]
VP, Legal Advocacy
(202) 266-8230

The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday handed down a decision in San Francisco v. EPA, a case concerning the Environmental Protection Agency’s duties to provide a path to compliance for certain clean water permits. NAHB filed an amicus brief in the case.

The case concerned “water quality standards” related to federal wastewater permits and how EPA must describe a permittee’s duties to meet those standards. In San Francisco’s permits, EPA said that the city had to meet the receiving waters’ — in this case, the Pacific Ocean — “water quality standard” without telling the city how that should be accomplished. San Francisco claimed this condition violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the Supreme Court agreed. 

NAHB filed an amicus brief in the case over the concern that if the court agreed with San Francisco’s argument, it could go too far and require EPA to include numeric discharge limits in CWA permits.

A large portion of NAHB members must comply with “construction general permits” (CGPs) due to their earthwork on site. CGPs contain “narrative” permit conditions, often referred to as “best management practices.” NAHB’s brief explained how narrative permit conditions comply with the CWA and cautioned the court not to eradicate them.

In deciding the case, the court focused on the words of the CWA that direct EPA to create limitations in permits to “meet” or “implement” water quality standards. It provided that simply telling permittees to comply with water quality standards does not explain how to “meet” or “implement” them. As a result, the court ruled in favor of San Francisco.

Moreover, the court went out of its way to ensure that the narrative requirements were not at issue in this case and that such requirements are allowed by the CWA. In fact, the court cited NAHB’s brief twice to make these points. 

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Business Management

Apr 21, 2026

NAHB Publication Offers Housing Professionals Tools to Help Boost Customer Satisfaction and Sales

BuilderBooks, the publishing arm of NAHB, released a new edition of its popular home buying resource, Buying Your New Home: A Guide to Home Buying, Second Edition.

Safety

Apr 20, 2026

Electrical Safety is Important to Everyone on a Home Building Site

Electrical safety on jobsites can often be overlooked by many workers whose primary jobs do not include electrical work. But all workers and visitors on a home building jobsite can be exposed to electric risk if proper safety procedures are not followed.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Apr 21, 2026

Population Growth and Housing Supply Dynamics at the County Level in 2025

U.S. population growth slowed notably in the latest Vintage 2025 population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau, with the nation expanding by just 0.5% in 2025, roughly half the pace of the prior year. The deceleration was primarily driven by a sharp decline in net international migration (NIM), which dropped from 2.7 million to 1.3 million, while natural change remained relatively stable.

Economics

Apr 20, 2026

Construction Workforce Shifts: Fewer Tradesmen, More White-Collar Jobs

The long-running shift in the construction labor force away from construction trades and toward management, business, and technical roles is ongoing and gaining momentum, according to NAHB’s analysis of the latest 2024 data from the American Community Survey (ACS).

Economics

Apr 17, 2026

Count of Second Homes Declines in 2024

In 2024, the number of second homes in the U.S. was 6.2 million, accounting for 4.3% of the nation’s housing stock, according to NAHB estimates. This reflects a modest decline from 2022, when the number reached 6.5 million. This decline suggests some cooling following the pandemic-era surge in second home demand.