SBA Issues Strong Rebuke to Transformer Rule Following Builder Input

Regulations
Published
Contact: Alex Strong
[email protected]
Senior Director, Federal Legislative
(202) 266-8279

The Small Business Administration’s (SBA) Office of Advocacy has delivered a stinging rebuke to the Department of Energy’s (DOE) proposed rule to regulate energy conservation standards for distribution transformers after NAHB voiced its strong concerns at a recent SBA forum.

At a time when the home building industry is facing a severe shortage of electrical transformers, the proposed rule would dictate that manufacturers increase the efficiency of distribution transformers by a mere tenth of a percentage point. In order to achieve this nominal increase in efficiency, the proposed rule would require manufacturers to transition to a different type of steel that would add months to a lengthy order cycle that already takes more than 16 months to produce and deploy new transformers.

In a seven-page letter to DOE opposing the agency’s proposed transformer rule, the SBA’s Office of Advocacy cited concerns raised by builders during their March 14 teleconference call with the SBA.

“Several [stakeholders] raised concerns about indirect impacts from the proposed rule, including to home building,” the SBA letter stated.

SBA’s letter to DOE went into greater detail regarding home builder concerns regarding DOE’s proposed rule.

“Small home builders noted that delays in transformer installation have led to significant costs to their projects,” the letter noted. “Not having power connected in structures that are already built has led to the potential for mold in the home due to poor ventilation in warmer climates/months.

“Additionally, home builders stated that they cannot close on a home unless the transformer is installed and working, and power is being generated to the home. This creates a ‘winners and losers’ scenario by which utilities are having to pick and choose when and how to connect transformers to a particular development.

“These delays amount to consumers backing out of home closings, and as a result significant costs to the builders. These indirect, cumulative impacts were not adequately considered by DOE in the rulemaking.”

NAHB has also sent comments to the DOE stating how this proposed rule will not only exacerbate the current nationwide shortage of electrical transformers, but also fuel delays in home construction projects across the country as well as aggravating the nation’s housing affordability crisis.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Advocacy

Jul 31, 2026

City Leaders Share Lessons on Breaking Through the Housing Debate

Mayors say collaboration and community engagement are key to building consensus across different perspectives to advance pro-housing policies.

Land Development | Economics

Jul 30, 2026

AI Data Centers Are Outbidding Home Builders for America's Land

As the demand for data processing increased dramatically with the advent of AI, companies building the centers began bidding up prices of land that had been on home builders' radar.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jul 30, 2026

PCE Inflation Eased in June

After reaching a three-year high last month, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge eased in June following declines in energy prices amid a temporary truce with Iran. This marked the first monthly decline in six years.

Economics

Jul 30, 2026

Top Ten Builder Share Across Largest Housing Markets

An earlier post described how the top ten builders in the country accounted for 43.6% of new single-family closings in 2025. BUILDER magazine has now released additional data on the top ten builders within each of the 50 largest new home markets in the U.S., ranked by single-family permits.

Economics

Jul 29, 2026

Amid Supply-Side Inflation Pressures, The Fed Holds

The Federal Reserve held the federal funds rate at a target range of 3.5% to 3.75% at the conclusion of its July policy meeting. There were three dissenting votes on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), all of which supported raising the federal funds rate by 25 basis points.