Understanding Impact Fees
Public service demands are constantly growing because of increasing population, inflation, rising real incomes, and myriad other reasons. And the local revenue base — including taxes, grants, and user fees and charges — does not always grow fast enough to meet the increased public service demands.
Many communities have turned to impact fees to construct public infrastructure systems on the assumption that new development must pay its way.
Impact fees are imposed by a local government on a new or proposed development project to pay for all or a portion of the costs of providing public services to the new development. This fee is levied on an upfront or front-end basis — usually at the time of building permit issuance or subdivision approval, or certificate of occupancy — and is prescribed by ordinance (although the dollar amount may or may not be specified).
However, the use of impact fees shifts much of the financial burden away from all public infrastructure users (i.e., the general public) to a narrow segment of the public: home builders and new home buyers.
NAHB has created a toolkit to explore impact fees and their potential effects on the local community, and to provide strategies for achieving balanced infrastructure financing solutions, including talking points for discussing impact fees within your local officials.
Learn more about this topic and other land development-related issues in NAHB’s Land Use 101.
Latest from NAHBNow
Stay informed on the issues shaping the housing industry by reviewing the monthly update talking points. The latest edition includes messages on trade issues and market conditions.
Join NAHB for a week of inspiring events and learning opportunities that showcase the achievements of women the industry. PWB Week will also highlight our efforts to promote, train, advance and recruit more women into the field.
Latest Economic News
U.S. house prices continued to rise in the second quarter of 2026, with most states and metropolitan areas recording annual gains. Elevated borrowing costs and affordability constraints remained important headwinds, while limited housing supply continued to support prices in many markets, particularly across parts of the Midwest and Northeast.
The number of open positions in the construction sector increased in July per the Bureau of Labor Statistics Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). The current level of open jobs is down from three years ago due to declines in construction activity, particularly in housing.
Home building trends diverged across geographies in the second quarter of 2026. According to the Home Building Geography Index (HBGI), single-family construction declined in nearly all geographic categories, although the contraction eased in most markets from the first quarter.