NAHB Supports Challenge to HUD’s Rule-Making Authority

Legal
Published
Contact: Thomas Ward
[email protected]
VP, Legal Advocacy
(202) 266-8230

NAHB recently filed an amicus brief in National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies v. Department of Housing and Urban Development at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The case involves a challenge by the insurance industry to HUD’s Disparate Impact Rule. The rule has a long history dating back to the Obama administration.

In 2013, HUD published a rule formalizing a “burden-shifting” test for determining whether a housing practice being challenged in court has an unjustified discriminatory effect.

Under the test, the plaintiff must first prove a challenged practice caused or predictably will cause a discriminatory effect. If the plaintiff meets its burden of proof, then the defendant must prove the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests. If the defendant meets this burden, then the plaintiff may still prevail upon proving that the substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.

The current version of the rule, promulgated early in the Biden administration, basically recodifies the 2013 rule.

On May 8, NAHB filed an amicus brief in the case challenging HUD’s authority to issue the rule. NAHB explained that the rule establishes judicial procedures and evidentiary standards that are usually created by courts.

Furthermore, NAHB argued that HUD exceeded its authority because Congress did not provide it with a clear statement allowing it to develop rules for the judiciary. Because the Constitution allows the executive branch to choose judges, if it can also set the rules for how those judges must try cases, too much power is concentrated in one branch of government.

Finally, one of the reasons HUD provided for developing the rule was that the federal Courts of Appeals were not in agreement on procedures/standards to be used when trying disparate impact cases. NAHB pointed out that when Courts of Appeals disagree, it is the Supreme Court that resolves the split, not federal agencies.

Briefing in this case should be complete by the end of July, and oral argument is expected before the end of the year.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Economics
Sep 08, 2026
How Are Rising Costs Impacting the Cost of Single-Family Homes?

The housing industry is experiencing elevated costs across the board — from land to labor and building materials. NAHB’s Economics team is in the process of measuring how these rising costs impact the cost to build single-family homes. And we need your help.

Advocacy
Sep 04, 2026
National Flood Insurance Program Extended Through Dec. 11

Congress passed a short-term continuing resolution extending funding at current levels for federal programs through Dec. 11.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics
Sep 07, 2026
Shorter Apartment Construction Time in 2025

The average time needed to complete construction of a multifamily building after obtaining authorization edged down in 2025, according to the 2025 Survey of Construction (SOC) from the Census Bureau.

Economics
Sep 04, 2026
Beating Expectations: U.S. Economy Adds 162,000 Jobs in August

The U.S. labor market rebounded in August, with nonfarm payrolls increasing by 162,000 and upward revisions adding 55,000 jobs to June and July. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.1%, as both employment and the labor force participation rate rose over the month.

Economics
Sep 04, 2026
New vs. Existing Home Prices: What the National Median Misses

In the second quarter of 2026, the national median price for a new single-family home was $410,700, $25,000 lower than the national median price of an existing home, which stood at $435,700.