NAHB Supports Challenge to HUD’s Rule-Making Authority
NAHB recently filed an amicus brief in National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies v. Department of Housing and Urban Development at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The case involves a challenge by the insurance industry to HUD’s Disparate Impact Rule. The rule has a long history dating back to the Obama administration.
In 2013, HUD published a rule formalizing a “burden-shifting” test for determining whether a housing practice being challenged in court has an unjustified discriminatory effect.
Under the test, the plaintiff must first prove a challenged practice caused or predictably will cause a discriminatory effect. If the plaintiff meets its burden of proof, then the defendant must prove the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests. If the defendant meets this burden, then the plaintiff may still prevail upon proving that the substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.
The current version of the rule, promulgated early in the Biden administration, basically recodifies the 2013 rule.
On May 8, NAHB filed an amicus brief in the case challenging HUD’s authority to issue the rule. NAHB explained that the rule establishes judicial procedures and evidentiary standards that are usually created by courts.
Furthermore, NAHB argued that HUD exceeded its authority because Congress did not provide it with a clear statement allowing it to develop rules for the judiciary. Because the Constitution allows the executive branch to choose judges, if it can also set the rules for how those judges must try cases, too much power is concentrated in one branch of government.
Finally, one of the reasons HUD provided for developing the rule was that the federal Courts of Appeals were not in agreement on procedures/standards to be used when trying disparate impact cases. NAHB pointed out that when Courts of Appeals disagree, it is the Supreme Court that resolves the split, not federal agencies.
Briefing in this case should be complete by the end of July, and oral argument is expected before the end of the year.
Latest from NAHBNow
Sep 12, 2025
Builders’ Guide to Keeping Job Sites and Communities PreparedSeptember is National Preparedness Month, an annual federal initiative to raise awareness and equip individuals, businesses and communities with the tools they need to prepare for disasters.
Sep 11, 2025
2026 Best of IBS Awards OpenThe NAHB International Builders’ Show® (IBS) recognizes the outstanding building products and services with the Best of IBS Awards. Apply by Nov. 21, 2025, to showcase your products.
Latest Economic News
Sep 12, 2025
Household Real Estate Asset Values Reach New HighThe market value of household real estate assets rose to $49.3 trillion in the second quarter of 2025, according to the most recent release of U.S. Federal Reserve Z.1 Financial Accounts. The value rose by 2.7% from the first quarter and is 1.1% higher than a year ago. This measure of market value estimates the value of all owner-occupied real estate nationwide.
Sep 11, 2025
Parking Trends in Newly Completed Single-Family Homes, 2024In 2024, 65% of newly completed single-family homes featured two-car garages, according to NAHB’s analysis of the Census’s Survey of Construction data. The share of new homes with three or more car garages stood at 15%, continuing a downward trend from its peak of 24% in 2015 and decreasing 2 percentage points from 2023.
Sep 10, 2025
Year-over-Year Building Material Price Growth AdvancesPrice growth for residential building materials rose for the fourth straight month in August, reaching its highest level since January 2023. Across domestic inputs goods and services into residential construction, service prices decreased in August while goods prices slightly advanced.