NAHB Supports Challenge to HUD’s Rule-Making Authority
NAHB recently filed an amicus brief in National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies v. Department of Housing and Urban Development at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The case involves a challenge by the insurance industry to HUD’s Disparate Impact Rule. The rule has a long history dating back to the Obama administration.
In 2013, HUD published a rule formalizing a “burden-shifting” test for determining whether a housing practice being challenged in court has an unjustified discriminatory effect.
Under the test, the plaintiff must first prove a challenged practice caused or predictably will cause a discriminatory effect. If the plaintiff meets its burden of proof, then the defendant must prove the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests. If the defendant meets this burden, then the plaintiff may still prevail upon proving that the substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.
The current version of the rule, promulgated early in the Biden administration, basically recodifies the 2013 rule.
On May 8, NAHB filed an amicus brief in the case challenging HUD’s authority to issue the rule. NAHB explained that the rule establishes judicial procedures and evidentiary standards that are usually created by courts.
Furthermore, NAHB argued that HUD exceeded its authority because Congress did not provide it with a clear statement allowing it to develop rules for the judiciary. Because the Constitution allows the executive branch to choose judges, if it can also set the rules for how those judges must try cases, too much power is concentrated in one branch of government.
Finally, one of the reasons HUD provided for developing the rule was that the federal Courts of Appeals were not in agreement on procedures/standards to be used when trying disparate impact cases. NAHB pointed out that when Courts of Appeals disagree, it is the Supreme Court that resolves the split, not federal agencies.
Briefing in this case should be complete by the end of July, and oral argument is expected before the end of the year.
Latest from NAHBNow
Oct 03, 2025
NAHB Awards Deadline Extended to Oct. 20Interested applicants for NAHB’s prestigious award programs now have additional time to submit top projects and individuals for consideration. Don't miss your chance - apply by Monday, Oct. 20.
Oct 03, 2025
Fast Money, Fewer HeadachesEvery week lost to underwriting is a week you’re not building, selling, or scaling. Delays push projects out of prime seasons, tighten cash flow, and leave crews idle. And when banks already move at their own pace, builders who aren’t prepared can get stuck at the back of the line.
Latest Economic News
Oct 03, 2025
Supply-Side Cost Pressures Drove Housing as Inflation Leader in 2024Though the rate of inflation peaked in June 2022, consumer prices continued to increase throughout 2023 and 2024 as inflation drove further price growth, according to 2024 CPI review from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Oct 02, 2025
Square Foot Prices Moderate in 2024Median square foot prices for new single-family detached (SFD) homes started in 2024 grew modestly, according to NAHB’s analysis of the latest Survey of Construction (SOC) data. For custom, or contractor-built, homes, the median price was $166 per square foot of floor space, up slightly from $162 in 2023.
Oct 02, 2025
17% of NAHB Builders Built Age-Restricted Housing in 2024Only 17% of NAHB builder members build age-restricted housing for people age 55 or older, according to 2024 Member Census. This is up two percentage points from the previous year. However, this share has remained within a narrow band (15%-17%) since the question was added to the member census in 2009.