NAHB Supports Challenge to HUD’s Rule-Making Authority
NAHB recently filed an amicus brief in National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies v. Department of Housing and Urban Development at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The case involves a challenge by the insurance industry to HUD’s Disparate Impact Rule. The rule has a long history dating back to the Obama administration.
In 2013, HUD published a rule formalizing a “burden-shifting” test for determining whether a housing practice being challenged in court has an unjustified discriminatory effect.
Under the test, the plaintiff must first prove a challenged practice caused or predictably will cause a discriminatory effect. If the plaintiff meets its burden of proof, then the defendant must prove the challenged practice is necessary to achieve one or more substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests. If the defendant meets this burden, then the plaintiff may still prevail upon proving that the substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interests supporting the challenged practice could be served by another practice that has a less discriminatory effect.
The current version of the rule, promulgated early in the Biden administration, basically recodifies the 2013 rule.
On May 8, NAHB filed an amicus brief in the case challenging HUD’s authority to issue the rule. NAHB explained that the rule establishes judicial procedures and evidentiary standards that are usually created by courts.
Furthermore, NAHB argued that HUD exceeded its authority because Congress did not provide it with a clear statement allowing it to develop rules for the judiciary. Because the Constitution allows the executive branch to choose judges, if it can also set the rules for how those judges must try cases, too much power is concentrated in one branch of government.
Finally, one of the reasons HUD provided for developing the rule was that the federal Courts of Appeals were not in agreement on procedures/standards to be used when trying disparate impact cases. NAHB pointed out that when Courts of Appeals disagree, it is the Supreme Court that resolves the split, not federal agencies.
Briefing in this case should be complete by the end of July, and oral argument is expected before the end of the year.
Latest from NAHBNow
Oct 14, 2025
Stucco No Longer Most-Used Exterior Wall MaterialFor the first time since 2018, vinyl siding surpassed stucco as the most used principal exterior wall material. According to the latest annual release of the U.S. Census Bureau’s Survey of Construction (SOC), 26% of homes started in 2024 had vinyl or vinyl-covered aluminum siding as their main exterior wall material.
Oct 14, 2025
North Carolina HBA, Local Builder Honor First Responder through Home SaleThe North Carolina Home Builders Association recently partnered with a local builder for a new project to benefit the family of a fallen first responder.
Latest Economic News
Oct 14, 2025
Custom Home Building Share Declines in 2024In 2024, 17.5% of all new single-family homes started were custom homes. This share decreased from 18.8% in 2023 and from 20.4% in 2022, according to data tabulated from the Census Bureau’s Survey of Construction (SOC).
Oct 13, 2025
Hispanics Comprise Nearly One-Third of the Construction Labor ForceDiversifying the construction labor force remains a key priority amid persistent skilled labor shortages. According to the 2023 American Community Survey, non-Hispanic White workers still account for the majority of the construction industry at 57%. Hispanic workers now represent nearly one-third of the labor force at 32%, followed by non-Hispanic Black workers at 5% and non-Hispanic Asian workers at 1.8%.
Oct 10, 2025
Vinyl Surpasses Stucco as Most Used Principal Exterior Wall MaterialIn 2024, vinyl siding was the most used principal exterior wall material for homes started. It holds just over a quarter share of homes, slightly surpassing stucco for the first time since 2018.