Supported by NAHB, Southern Arizona HBA Wins Impact Fee Decision

Legal
Published
Contact: Thomas Ward
[email protected]
VP, Legal Advocacy
(202) 266-8230

The Arizona Supreme Court, on Jan. 17, handed down a victory to the Southern Arizona Home Builders Association (SAHBA) in its case against the Town of Marana over its onerous impact fees.

The SAHBA, on behalf of its members, filed a lawsuit claiming the town’s impact fees were illegal since they only applied to future home owners and not current residents.

The Town of Marana acquired title to a wastewater reclamation facility (WRF) from Pima County in 2013. Previously, Pima County used the WRF to serve the Town of Marana. Because of new Arizona water quality standards and certain limitations of a secondary system at the WRF, updates were required. To fund the improvements, the town levied an impact fee on home development, passing the costs to future home owners. 

The Arizona Supreme Court ultimately found this cost shifting to be illegal. Arizona state law prohibits impact fees funding improvements to existing systems for existing users. The fees can only fund improvements necessary for new development. The town was trying to blur those lines and pass on the costs of the required WRF improvements to future home owners.

This case is a huge win for Arizona home builders. Impact fees are a necessary nuisance to development, and when they are imposed, it must be done in a fair manner. Irresponsible impact fees stymie development and raise costs for future home owners.

Read the Arizona Supreme Court opinion.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Codes and Standards

Apr 07, 2026

ICC Public Comment Hearings on Proposed Building Code Changes Begin April 19

The International Code Council (ICC) will hold its combined Public Comment Hearings for the 2024-2027 code cycle beginning April 19 in Hartford, Conn. NAHB members interested in building codes are encouraged to attend or watch a livestream of the hearings.

Housing Finance

Apr 07, 2026

Trump Seeks Nearly $11 Billion Cut to HUD Programs

President Trump has proposed a budget that would cut non-defense discretionary spending by $73 billion for fiscal year 2027, which runs from Oct. 1, 2026, through Sept. 30, 2027. The spending reductions include a $10.7 billion cut — about 13% — for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Apr 07, 2026

Rising Rates Weigh on Mortgage Activity

Mortgage application activity decreased month-over-month as the 30-year fixed mortgage rate rose. The Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) Market Composite Index, a measure of total mortgage application volume, declined 4.3% from February on a seasonally adjusted basis but remained 30.8% higher than a year earlier.

Economics

Apr 06, 2026

Which States and Construction Trades Depend the Most on Immigrant Workers?

Immigrants’ share of the construction workforce reached a record high in 2024, with foreign-born workers accounting for more than a quarter of the industry’s labor force (26.3%). The share is even higher among construction trades, for which one in three craftsmen is foreign-born.

Economics

Apr 03, 2026

Job Growth Rebounds in March

The U.S. labor market showed signs of a modest rebound in March following a weak February, as payroll employment increased and the unemployment rate edged down to 4.3%. Job growth was led by healthcare, construction, and transportation and warehousing.