Marijuana on the Jobsite: A Positive Test vs. Impairment
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, marijuana — or cannabis — is the most commonly-used federally illegal drug in the United States, with an estimated 48.2 million people using it in 2019.
Despite its recreational legalization in many states, employers are free to ban the use and possession of marijuana in the workplace and are not prohibited from disciplinary action against employees who are using marijuana during work hours or while using employer property. Moreover, an employer is not prohibited from taking employment action against an employee if the employee is impaired by cannabis while working.
How do I know if someone is impaired?
There currently is no legally or medically accepted definition of what constitutes “impairment” (or being “under the influence” of marijuana). Unlike alcohol testing, impairment by marijuana cannot be objectively measured by any scientifically proven methodology. Current testing does not identify intoxication, only the presence of marijuana metabolites or THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. There is also no dispositive and complete list of symptoms of impairment.
In some states employers may consider an employee to be impaired or under the influence of cannabis if the employer has a good faith belief that an employee manifests specific, articulable symptoms while working that decrease or lessen the employee’s performance or interfere with an employer’s obligation to provide a safe and healthy workplace, free from recognized hazards, as required by state and federal occupational safety and health laws. Signs of impairment while working (or on call) include, but are not limited to:
- Changes in speech and demeanor
- Impaired dexterity, agility and coordination
- Irrational or unusual behavior
- Negligence or carelessness when operating equipment or machinery
- Disregard for the safety of the employee or others
- Carelessness that results in any injury to the employee or to others
- Involvement in any accident that results in serious damage to equipment or property
Only symptoms that provide objectively observable indications that the employee’s performance of the essential duties or tasks of their position are decreased or lessened may be cited and these symptoms do not provide definitive proof. Employers are cautioned that such symptoms may also be an indication that an employee has a disability protected by state or federal law.
Proof may require demonstrating one or more of the symptoms of being impaired by marijuana and testing positive for the presence of marijuana in the employee’s system at the time the symptom is demonstrated. While it may be possible to act without the confirmation of a positive test result, it has been suggested that it is risky to do so because the law also provides that the employee must be given “a reasonable opportunity to contest the basis of the determination.”
What cannot be cited by an employer as articulable symptoms of impairment?
Employers may not use drug testing as a basis for an articulable symptom of impairment. It is a widely recognized view that a marijuana-positive result by itself says virtually nothing about impairment at work. Marijuana can be detected in bodily fluids for up to 30 days and in hair for up to 90 days after use, long after the impairment effects have worn off (see National Institutes of Health: NCBI: Objective Testing: Urine and Other Drug Tests).
A best practice for employers who test current employees for marijuana is to define and explain “impairment” and being “under the influence.” They should establish a strong record of impairment independent of a marijuana-positive result. That would include thorough, contemporaneous documentation of the reasons employees are sent for a reasonable suspicion testing. It could include an accident investigation report that rules out non-drug-related causes where circumstances warrant that conclusion.
Employers are advised to consult outside counsel for help in revising policies and addressing new marijuana challenges in the workplace.
For more information on marijuana and its implications for the workplace visit the NAHB Construction Liability Resources page.
Latest from NAHBNow
Feb 25, 2026
House Approves NAHB-Supported Energy Codes BillThe House today approved the Homeowner Energy Freedom Act, NAHB-supported legislation that would repeal burdensome provisions from the Inflation Reduction Act, including a provision that provides states $1 billion to incentivize the adoption of the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC).
Feb 25, 2026
Is the Decline in Young Adult-Led Households a Cyclical Slip or the New Normal?The headship rates among young adults — the share of adults ages 25-34 heading their own households — declined in 2024 to 43.7% after a post-pandemic jump. Are cyclical factors causing household rates to fluctuate, or is the data pointing to a new long-term trend?
Latest Economic News
Feb 25, 2026
Housing’s Share of GDP Declined Further at the End of 2025Housing’s share of the economy was 16.0% in the fourth quarter of 2025, according to the latest estimates of GDP produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This share is down from 16.1% in the third quarter and is also lower than 16.3% as registered just one year ago.
Feb 24, 2026
Young Adult Headship Rates in 2024: Cyclical Slip or New Equilibrium?Reversing the post-pandemic rebound, the headship rates among young adults (the share of the population heading their own households) declined in 2024, according to NAHB’s analysis of the American Community Survey (ACS) data.
Feb 23, 2026
A 25-Basis-Point Decline in the Mortgage Rate Prices-In 1.42 Million HouseholdsHousing affordability remains a critical challenge nationwide, and mortgage rates continue to play a central role in shaping homebuying power. Although rates have declined from the recent peak of about 7.6% in 2023 to around 6.01% as of February 19,2026, they remain elevated relative to typical levels in the 2010s.