Marijuana on the Jobsite: A Positive Test vs. Impairment

Legal
Published

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, marijuana — or cannabis — is the most commonly-used federally illegal drug in the United States, with an estimated 48.2 million people using it in 2019.

Despite its recreational legalization in many states, employers are free to ban the use and possession of marijuana in the workplace and are not prohibited from disciplinary action against employees who are using marijuana during work hours or while using employer property. Moreover, an employer is not prohibited from taking employment action against an employee if the employee is impaired by cannabis while working.

How do I know if someone is impaired?

There currently is no legally or medically accepted definition of what constitutes “impairment” (or being “under the influence” of marijuana). Unlike alcohol testing, impairment by marijuana cannot be objectively measured by any scientifically proven methodology. Current testing does not identify intoxication, only the presence of marijuana metabolites or THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. There is also no dispositive and complete list of symptoms of impairment.

In some states employers may consider an employee to be impaired or under the influence of cannabis if the employer has a good faith belief that an employee manifests specific, articulable symptoms while working that decrease or lessen the employee’s performance or interfere with an employer’s obligation to provide a safe and healthy workplace, free from recognized hazards, as required by state and federal occupational safety and health laws. Signs of impairment while working (or on call) include, but are not limited to:

  • Changes in speech and demeanor
  • Impaired dexterity, agility and coordination
  • Irrational or unusual behavior
  • Negligence or carelessness when operating equipment or machinery
  • Disregard for the safety of the employee or others
  • Carelessness that results in any injury to the employee or to others
  • Involvement in any accident that results in serious damage to equipment or property

Only symptoms that provide objectively observable indications that the employee’s performance of the essential duties or tasks of their position are decreased or lessened may be cited and these symptoms do not provide definitive proof. Employers are cautioned that such symptoms may also be an indication that an employee has a disability protected by state or federal law.

Proof may require demonstrating one or more of the symptoms of being impaired by marijuana and testing positive for the presence of marijuana in the employee’s system at the time the symptom is demonstrated. While it may be possible to act without the confirmation of a positive test result, it has been suggested that it is risky to do so because the law also provides that the employee must be given “a reasonable opportunity to contest the basis of the determination.”

What cannot be cited by an employer as articulable symptoms of impairment?

Employers may not use drug testing as a basis for an articulable symptom of impairment. It is a widely recognized view that a marijuana-positive result by itself says virtually nothing about impairment at work. Marijuana can be detected in bodily fluids for up to 30 days and in hair for up to 90 days after use, long after the impairment effects have worn off (see National Institutes of Health: NCBI: Objective Testing: Urine and Other Drug Tests).

A best practice for employers who test current employees for marijuana is to define and explain “impairment” and being “under the influence.” They should establish a strong record of impairment independent of a marijuana-positive result. That would include thorough, contemporaneous documentation of the reasons employees are sent for a reasonable suspicion testing. It could include an accident investigation report that rules out non-drug-related causes where circumstances warrant that conclusion.

Employers are advised to consult outside counsel for help in revising policies and addressing new marijuana challenges in the workplace.

For more information on marijuana and its implications for the workplace visit the NAHB Construction Liability Resources page.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Labor

Feb 27, 2026

Labor Department Proposes New FLSA Independent Contractor Rule

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) today published notice of its intent to revise its regulations that distinguish covered employees from exempt independent contractors for enforcement purposes under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and other laws.

Advocacy

Feb 27, 2026

NAHB Invests $190,000 to Advance Local Pro-Housing Policies

NAHB's State and Local Government Affairs Committee recently approved $190,000 through the State and Local Issues Fund (SLIF) to help HBAs overcome barriers to housing affordability.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Feb 27, 2026

Price Growth for Building Materials Slows to Start the Year

Residential building material prices rose at a slower rate in January, according to the latest Producer Price Index release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This was the first decline in the rate of price growth since April of last year. Metal products continue to experience price increases, while specific wood products are showing declines in prices.

Economics

Feb 26, 2026

Home Improvement Loan Applications Moderate as Borrower Profile Gradually Ages

Home improvement activity has remained elevated in the post-pandemic period, but both the volume of loan applications and the age profile of borrowers have shifted in notable ways. Data from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), analyzed by NAHB, show that total home improvement loan applications have eased from their recent post-pandemic peak, and the distribution of borrowers across age groups has gradually tilted older.

Economics

Feb 26, 2026

Affordability Pyramid Shows Over Half of U.S. Households Cannot Buy a $300,000 Home

NAHB recently released its 2026 Priced-Out Analysis, highlighting the housing affordability challenge. While previous posts discussed the impacts of rising home prices and interest rates on affordability, this post focuses on the related U.S. housing affordability pyramid.