HUD Resources on Housing Production and Cost Reinforce NAHB Land Development Policy

Housing Affordability
Published

In its recent article “Opportunities to Increase Housing Production and Preservation,” HUD describes the current housing crisis in the United States and connects an inadequate supply of housing to rising costs.

Housing production, while rising, is overshadowed by a lack in building permits for new housing. HUD attributes the inevitable increase in cost-burdened households and home prices to a federal, state and local regulatory environment that “contributes to the extensive mismatch between supply and need.”

The article also points to a HUD white paper, “Eliminating Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing: Federal, State, Local, and Tribal Opportunities,” describing efforts of local and state government actions to reduce barriers that limit housing production. Examples extend beyond higher-profile jurisdictions, such as Minneapolis, Portland, Ore., and California, to include legislation such as Arkansas SB 170, preventing cities and counties from regulating building design elements, which can needlessly raise housing costs.

NAHB and the Arkansas Home Builders Association were active stakeholders in this legislation to ensure overly prescriptive design standards — for example, only allowing homes with certain exterior building materials or even a minimum number of roof pitches — would not create additional barriers to homeownership. This example along with more can be found in NAHB’s report, “Residential Design Standards: How Stringent Regulations Restrict Affordability and Choice.”

One of the most noted examples of restrictive land use in this country is single-family zoning. Multiple state and local governments, and even the Biden administration, have begun to prioritize changing zoning codes to allow a greater variety of unit types on residential land. HUD’s white paper acknowledges “many communities throughout the country limit the production of the ‘missing middle’ housing, that set of diverse, unsubsidized housing options that blend into single-family neighborhoods, ranging from bungalow courts, townhouses, duplexes to fourplexes, and courtyard apartments, which is necessary to meet the spectrum of housing.”

NAHB outlines strong examples of these types of “missing middle” housing in its report, “Diversifying Housing Options with Smaller Lots and Smaller Homes.”

NAHB has been active in advocating for better land development policy and providing resources to help educate the public on the impact such policies can have on housing affordability. To access these resources and find out more information on effective land development policies, visit nahb.org.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Advocacy

Nov 19, 2025

NAHB Offers Lawmakers Recommendations on National E-Verify System

NAHB today offered Congress several recommendations to make a national E-Verify employment verification system workable for small businesses and members of the residential construction industry.

Advocacy | Economics

Nov 18, 2025

Podcast: Latest Housing Developments Live from Fall Meeting

In the latest episode of NAHB's podcast, Housing Developments, CEO Jim Tobin and COO Paul Lopez discuss recent developments in the housing market live from the NAHB Fall Leadership Meeting in Denver.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Nov 19, 2025

Affordability Impacts: Young Adults Are Once Again Moving Back Home

The share of young adults living with parents increased in 2024, interrupting the post-pandemic trend of moving out of parental homes.

Economics

Nov 18, 2025

Location, Location, Location: How Place and Neighborhood Shape Home Values

The value of a single-family home depends not only on its physical features but also on its location and neighborhood context.

Economics

Nov 18, 2025

Builder Sentiment Relatively Flat in November as Market Headwinds Persist

Market uncertainty exacerbated by the government shutdown along with economic uncertainty stemming from tariffs and rising construction costs kept builder confidence firmly in negative territory in November.