HUD Resources on Housing Production and Cost Reinforce NAHB Land Development Policy
In its recent article “Opportunities to Increase Housing Production and Preservation,” HUD describes the current housing crisis in the United States and connects an inadequate supply of housing to rising costs.
Housing production, while rising, is overshadowed by a lack in building permits for new housing. HUD attributes the inevitable increase in cost-burdened households and home prices to a federal, state and local regulatory environment that “contributes to the extensive mismatch between supply and need.”
The article also points to a HUD white paper, “Eliminating Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing: Federal, State, Local, and Tribal Opportunities,” describing efforts of local and state government actions to reduce barriers that limit housing production. Examples extend beyond higher-profile jurisdictions, such as Minneapolis, Portland, Ore., and California, to include legislation such as Arkansas SB 170, preventing cities and counties from regulating building design elements, which can needlessly raise housing costs.
NAHB and the Arkansas Home Builders Association were active stakeholders in this legislation to ensure overly prescriptive design standards — for example, only allowing homes with certain exterior building materials or even a minimum number of roof pitches — would not create additional barriers to homeownership. This example along with more can be found in NAHB’s report, “Residential Design Standards: How Stringent Regulations Restrict Affordability and Choice.”
One of the most noted examples of restrictive land use in this country is single-family zoning. Multiple state and local governments, and even the Biden administration, have begun to prioritize changing zoning codes to allow a greater variety of unit types on residential land. HUD’s white paper acknowledges “many communities throughout the country limit the production of the ‘missing middle’ housing, that set of diverse, unsubsidized housing options that blend into single-family neighborhoods, ranging from bungalow courts, townhouses, duplexes to fourplexes, and courtyard apartments, which is necessary to meet the spectrum of housing.”
NAHB outlines strong examples of these types of “missing middle” housing in its report, “Diversifying Housing Options with Smaller Lots and Smaller Homes.”
NAHB has been active in advocating for better land development policy and providing resources to help educate the public on the impact such policies can have on housing affordability. To access these resources and find out more information on effective land development policies, visit nahb.org.
Latest from NAHBNow
Oct 03, 2025
NAHB Awards Deadline Extended to Oct. 20Interested applicants for NAHB’s prestigious award programs now have additional time to submit top projects and individuals for consideration. Don't miss your chance - apply by Monday, Oct. 20.
Oct 03, 2025
Fast Money, Fewer HeadachesEvery week lost to underwriting is a week you’re not building, selling, or scaling. Delays push projects out of prime seasons, tighten cash flow, and leave crews idle. And when banks already move at their own pace, builders who aren’t prepared can get stuck at the back of the line.
Latest Economic News
Oct 03, 2025
Supply-Side Cost Pressures Drove Housing as Inflation Leader in 2024Though the rate of inflation peaked in June 2022, consumer prices continued to increase throughout 2023 and 2024 as inflation drove further price growth, according to 2024 CPI review from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Oct 02, 2025
Square Foot Prices Moderate in 2024Median square foot prices for new single-family detached (SFD) homes started in 2024 grew modestly, according to NAHB’s analysis of the latest Survey of Construction (SOC) data. For custom, or contractor-built, homes, the median price was $166 per square foot of floor space, up slightly from $162 in 2023.
Oct 02, 2025
17% of NAHB Builders Built Age-Restricted Housing in 2024Only 17% of NAHB builder members build age-restricted housing for people age 55 or older, according to 2024 Member Census. This is up two percentage points from the previous year. However, this share has remained within a narrow band (15%-17%) since the question was added to the member census in 2009.