Proposed Changes to Partnership Tax Rules Would Raise $172 Billion

Tax Reform
Published

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) released the outline of a bill that would significantly alter the tax rules for partnerships. Billed as reducing “partnership tax complexity,” these changes would restrict the ability of partnerships to allocate income and deductions unless those allocations are in line with the partners’ ownership percentages. Sen. Wyden indicated these changes would raise $172 billion in additional tax revenue over the next 10 years and that this proposal will be considered for inclusion as part of the massive tax overhaul plan Democrats are now assembling.

Wyden includes several examples of what his proposal is intended to do, the following which is taken directly from his summary materials and reflects his perspectives:

  • Contributions and distributions of appreciated (or depreciated) property are generally tax free. Partnerships are supposed to allocate built-in gains and losses on contributed property in a way that limits abuse, but they get to choose among three or more allocation methods. Only one —the “remedial method” — actually prevents tax from being shifted between the partners. The discussion draft would require partnerships to use the remedial method, making sure gain and the related tax liability, cannot be shifted.
  • Upon a change in the interests of the partners, a partnership can elect — but is not required — to revalue its assets to prevent the shifting of built-in gain and loss. The discussion draft would require such revaluations.
  • The partnership tax rules afford tremendous flexibility in the allocation of partnership income and losses among partners. The discussion draft would remove optionality and in doing so, simplify administration and curtail abuse. For certain related-party partnerships, the discussion draft would require all income and loss to be allocated pro-rata.

Legislative text is not yet available, but a short summary can be found here and more detailed analysis can be viewed here.

NAHB opposes tax hikes on businesses and will remain actively involved as this tax package moves through Congress.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Economics

Mar 26, 2026

How Old is Today's Housing Stock?

New home construction faces headwinds such as rising material costs, a persistent labor shortage, and elevated interest rates. These challenges have contributed to an insufficient supply of new construction, making the nation’s owner-occupied housing stock significantly older over time.

Leading Suppliers Council | Codes and Standards

Mar 25, 2026

New Electrical Code Change for Kitchen Islands: What Builders Need to Know

For some jurisdictions, the recent revisions to the 2023 National Electrical Code (NEC), specifically Section 210.52(C), change how receptacles can be installed in kitchen islands and peninsulas. But builders, designers, and electricians can consider alternative ways to provide power to kitchen islands.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Mar 26, 2026

State/Local Property Tax Revenue Rises Past $210 Billion in the Fourth Quarter

Property tax revenue collected by state and local governments rose for the ninth consecutive quarter according to the Census Bureau’s quarterly summary of state and local tax revenue.

Economics

Mar 25, 2026

Age of Housing Stock by State

According to the latest data from the 2024 American Community Survey (ACS), the median age of owner-occupied homes has reached 42 years old. The age of the housing stock is an important remodeling market indicator.

Economics

Mar 24, 2026

Almost Half of the Owner-Occupied Homes Built Before 1980

Around 47% of the U.S. housing stock was built in the 1980s and earlier. The median age of owner-occupied homes climbed to 42 years old in 2024, up from 31 in 2005 according to the latest data from the American Community Survey.