Employee vs. Independent Contractor is an Important Distinction for Builders
A recent thread on the All Member Forum on NAHB Connect discussed the classification of workers as independent contractors and employees, prompting the following note from NAHB legal staff.
Due to the costs businesses face if they are found to have wrongly classified their workers, it is important to make hiring decisions with a clear understanding of how the law views such workers.
The law permits the use of independent contractors, provided such workers are not “employees” under existing tax, employee benefit, and labor and employment laws. Engaging independent contractors instead of employees can result in considerable cost savings and increased workforce flexibility, and most home builders work extensively with contractors.
If an employee is classified as an independent contractor, the “employer” is not required to pay and/or withhold a variety of payroll‐related taxes, fees and benefits (Social Security and Medicare taxes, local, state and federal income taxes, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, pension and health benefits, etc.). Not only are these costs shifted to the individual worker, the independent contractor is also not fully protected by various employment laws (minimum wage and overtime requirements, workers compensation protection, etc.).
Proper classification of workers as independent contractors, however, is not as simple as a written agreement between the parties. No single test exists to evaluate independent contractor status for all purposes, and compliance is often complicated by the fact that different tests may apply. Responding to mounting evidence that many employers nationwide have classified some of their employees as independent contractors as a cost-savings measure, there has been increased focus at the federal and state levels on whether workers are properly classified.
Some states have focused their efforts on specific industries, most notably the construction industry.
The consequences of misclassifying individuals as independent contractors may result in large penalties or damages awards, including unpaid overtime compensation, tax and insurance obligations, liquidated damages, and civil penalties.
At the federal level, the National Labor Relations Act, The Civil Rights Act, Fair Labor Standards Act, and Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) each use a different definition of an employee and various tests, or criteria to distinguish independent contractors from employees.
Similarly, at the state level, often there is no single test to determine employment classifications. For example, in New York the Construction Industry Fair Play Act creates a presumption of employment in the construction industry unless an employer can meet the ABC test. The New York State Department of Taxation and Finance uses the “common law” test for determining employment status.
Thus, a worker may be an independent contractor under a test used by one agency, and an employee under the test used by another agency, creating confusion for businesses.
Generally the tests are geared toward determining the level of control the company has over the worker, but the tests may differ in the number and type of factors considered and the weight assigned to each factor.
For more information on engaging independent contractors, consult with your local attorney or seek the services of a qualified professional experienced in labor and employment matters.
Latest from NAHBNow
Sep 15, 2025
The Impact of the Professional Women in Building Leadership GrantProfessional Women in Building's annual scholarhsip programs provide students and emerging professionals with the resources, support and opportunities they need to thrive and lead the housing industry.
Sep 15, 2025
Associate Award Winners Share Meaning Behind Their WinNAHB is excited to award two of the association's top Associate contributors each year for their achievements. Two previous winners reflect on their experiences.
Latest Economic News
Sep 12, 2025
Household Real Estate Asset Values Reach New HighThe market value of household real estate assets rose to $49.3 trillion in the second quarter of 2025, according to the most recent release of U.S. Federal Reserve Z.1 Financial Accounts. The value rose by 2.7% from the first quarter and is 1.1% higher than a year ago. This measure of market value estimates the value of all owner-occupied real estate nationwide.
Sep 11, 2025
Parking Trends in Newly Completed Single-Family Homes, 2024In 2024, 65% of newly completed single-family homes featured two-car garages, according to NAHB’s analysis of the Census’s Survey of Construction data. The share of new homes with three or more car garages stood at 15%, continuing a downward trend from its peak of 24% in 2015 and decreasing 2 percentage points from 2023.
Sep 10, 2025
Year-over-Year Building Material Price Growth AdvancesPrice growth for residential building materials rose for the fourth straight month in August, reaching its highest level since January 2023. Across domestic inputs goods and services into residential construction, service prices decreased in August while goods prices slightly advanced.