How Builders Are Dealing with Rising Lumber Prices

Economics
Published

As NAHB continues to work tirelessly to combat rising lumber prices and supply shortages by aggressively engaging with the Biden administration and members of Congress, builders who are on the frontlines are engaging in several strategies to mitigate this unprecedented price surge that is raising housing costs and impacting their bottom lines.

NAHB recently asked builders about their reactions to the rising and volatile lumber prices in its April 2021 survey for the NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index (HMI). Nearly half (47%) of single-family builders in the HMI panel indicated that they were including price escalation clauses in their sales contracts as their primary mitigation effort.

“It’s been a difficult time for us and home owners,” Jeremy Burke, a remodeler in Pennsylvania, shared through NAHB’s online lumber testimonial form. “We have had to prepare contracts with clauses for material change orders when materials cost rise — which I fear means we will lose contacts and/or projects for those who can’t afford the extra costs.”

Other efforts include pre-ordering lumber (29%) and obtaining lumber price guarantees from suppliers (22%). According to responses, prices were typically guaranteed for 15-29 days (42% of respondents reported) or 30-59 days (33% of respondents reported), for a median length of 28 days.

“We are pricing each unit on a case-by-case basis, and only after we have a commitment on actual lumber costs for that unit,” noted Thomas Troy, a builder in New Jersey, in a testimonial. “We are at the point where we are withholding new sections in some projects.”

Nearly one in five builders (19%) have also, unfortunately, had to delay building or sales when costs spike, and 15% indicated they are laying the foundation but pausing before framing. This puts further strain on the much-needed housing supply necessary to help make housing affordable.

“We have always prided ourselves on being able to provide affordable housing to our local market, while also being financially prudent to the best practices in the building industry,” stated Michael Welty, a builder in Colorado, in a testimonial. “When you couple these price increases with the limited amount of supply that currently resides in our housing market, the current conditions are creating an escalating market that in our opinion will eventually be unsustainable.”

Paul Emrath, vice president of surveys and housing policy research, provides more analysis and details in this Eye on Housing post.

How Builders are Dealing with Lumber Prices

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Education

Jul 06, 2026

Estimating Tools to Efficiently Plan and Increase Profitability

With building material prices on the rise, now is a critical time for project managers to refine their estimating strategies to optimize each build.

Advocacy

Jul 02, 2026

U.S. Declines to Renew USMCA Trade Pact

The Trump administration announced yesterday that it will not renew the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jul 06, 2026

Top Ten Builder Market Share Falls in 2025

The top ten builders accounted for 43.6% of all new U.S. single-family home closings in 2025, down 1.2 percentage points from 2024 (44.8%), based on BUILDER magazine data.

Economics

Jul 03, 2026

Mortgage Rates Increased in June as Markets Weigh Inflation and Fed Policy

Mortgage rates continued to increase in June as markets priced in a rate hike due to high inflation and stronger-than-expected labor market.

Economics

Jul 02, 2026

U.S. Economy Adds 57,000 Jobs in June

The U.S. labor market lost momentum in June, with total nonfarm payroll employment rising by just 57,000, the smallest gain since February’s outright decline. Downward revisions to April and May payroll estimates subtracted a combined 74,000 jobs from previously reported totals, reversing the sizable upward revisions reported a month earlier and suggesting underlying hiring momentum was weaker than initially reported.