Court Blocks Part of Labor Department's Joint Employer Rule
The rule, which became effective in March 2020, was subsequently challenged by 18 states on the grounds that the rule was invalid. On Sept. 8, the federal district court for the Southern District of New York agreed, holding that the part of the rule dealing with vertical joint employment was arbitrary and capricious (there are two joint employer scenarios under the FLSA – vertical and horizontal employment).
The Court offered the following example of vertical employment:
Imagine that an employee works for a contractor. A corporation hires the contractor. The contractor fails to pay the employee the minimum wage, as required by the FLSA. If the contractor and the corporation are the employee's joint employers, the employee can sue both the contractor and the corporation for back wages. In other words, the contractor and the corporation are both on the hook for the employee's damages. But if the contractor and the corporation are separate employers, then the employee can sue only the contractor. Note that the wages due to the employee are the same in either scenario. The joint employment doctrine addresses only from whom the employee may collect damages. Imagine, for example, that the contractor goes bankrupt. If the corporation is her joint employer, the employee can still recover. If not, the employee is out of luck.
Horizontal relationships, which are rarer, involve related entities that employ the same worker.
The Final Rule narrowed the definition of joint employment by requiring actual control. Under the broader interpretations, builders faced uncertainty about what level of necessary oversight and coordination of their subcontractors might trigger joint employer liability. Under the Final Rule, where an employee performed work for the employer that simultaneously benefited another individual or entity, DOL provided a four-part test to determine whether the potential joint employer actually exercised the power to:
- Hire or fire the employee;
- Supervise and control the employee's work schedules or conditions of employment;
- Set the employee's pay rate and method of payment; and
- Maintain the employee's employment records.
In such a case, whether a person was a joint employer would depend on all the facts in a particular case. Additional factors could also be relevant in determining whether another person was a joint employer in this situation, but only when they showed whether the potential joint employer was exercising significant control over the terms and conditions of the employee's work.
It remains to be seen whether DOL will appeal the decision.
It also unclear at this time whether the scope of the decision extends beyond the Southern District of New York to the states that challenged the rule, or even nationwide.
According to published reports, the head of DOL's Wage and Hour Division said the Agency is disappointed in the district court's decision regarding the Joint Employer Rule but that it stands by the Rule and is weighing all options.
According to experts, businesses should evaluate their current arrangements, and companies that relied on DOL's new control tests to restructure business relationships should consult with their attorney as to the applicable law in their jurisdiction because the federal circuits apply different multifactor tests, and state laws may vary. NAHB will continue to monitor developments in the case and provide updates to members.
For more information, contact David Jaffe.
Latest from NAHBNow
Apr 30, 2025
NAHB Mourns Passing of Member Kim ShanahanNAHB mourns the passing of Kim Shanahan, who played an integral role in the Sustainability & Green Building Subcommittee and Healthier Homes and Communities Subcommittee.
Apr 30, 2025
Global Innovation Home of the Year Brings Wellness to Production Home DesignERTH360, a home design and architecture firm based in Ontario, has spent years focused on bringing wellness concepts to production home design. Its design won the Gold award for GIA Global Innovation Home of Year at NAHB’s The Nationals for 2024.
Latest Economic News
Apr 30, 2025
U.S. Economy Contracted in First Quarter of 2025The U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter of 2025 for the first time in three years, driven by a sharp surge in pre-tariff imports, softening consumer spending, and a decline in government spending.
Apr 30, 2025
House Sharing is Not Just for Young AdultsA record-high 6.8 million households shared their housing with unrelated housemates, roommates or boarders in 2023. While college-age and young adults make up the largest subset of house sharers (close to 41%), this type of living arrangement is gaining popularity among older householders fastest, with the 55+ segment accounting for 30% of all house-sharing households in 2023.
Apr 29, 2025
Jobs Openings Fall as Economy SlowsConsistent with soft sentiment data, the count of job openings for the overall economy and construction fell in March as employers slowed hiring plans amid a broader economic slowdown, per the March Bureau of Labor Statistics Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS).