San Diego Builders Help Defeat Anti-Housing Ballot Measure

Codes and Standards
Published

A diverse coalition led by the Building Industry Association (BIA) of San Diego County and local REALTORS® defeated a March 3 ballot measure that could have limited housing development in rural areas of San Diego County, Calif.

Measure A, if passed, would have required a countywide vote on any major housing project that involves a change to the county’s general plan. Developers working on any project larger than six homes would need permission from voters, rather than the approval of three county supervisors, if the project is outside the general plan guidelines for urban growth.

The “No on A” coalition, which brought together labor leaders, first responders and politicians on both sides of the aisle, argued the initiative is anti-growth and anti-housing, noting loopholes and exemptions existed for developments like hotels, resorts and casinos. They also said the current system did not need to change and would only add another regulatory layer to new home building in a county already plagued as one of the top five least affordable housing markets in the nation.

BIA of San Diego County President and CEO Borre Winckel said in a No on A statement, “a coalition of unprecedented diversity and strength came together to defeat this bad public policy – and we are just getting started. We are grateful that people of passion and conviction throughout our region raised their voices in support of the cause, recognizing that we need to remove obstacles to housing and ensure that working people and the next generation of San Diegans can afford to live here.”

“Voters understood Measure A would not do what it promised, that it was riddled with loopholes, and that it would force more San Diegans to pay more for homes and apartments in the midst of our housing affordability crisis,” campaign manager Tony Manolatos added.

NAHB supported the defeat of the measure through its State and Local Issues Fund, which provides financial assistance to local HBAs involved in advocacy efforts that could set a precedent for home builders nationwide.

The slim margin of victory, 51.5% to 48.5%, based on March 10 results includes 100% of precincts reporting. However, it does not include all of the more than 1.35 million mail ballots that need only be postmarked by election day. Additionally, provisional ballots – cast for a variety of reasons – can take an unspecified amount of time to be deemed eligible. Still, news outlets and opponents of Measure A declared the measure defeated.

To see more Election 2020 coverage and our efforts to ensuring housing issues are a key part of the conversation throughout the campaign season, visit nahb.org.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

IBS | Leading Suppliers Council | Design

Jun 20, 2025

The New American Home 2026: Innovation Meets Impact

The New American Home 2026, the official show home of the 2026 NAHB International Builders’ Show® in Orlando, is already drawing industry buzz for its distinctive design and rare structural features.

Remodeling | Publications

Jun 19, 2025

Award-Winning Advice: Surround Yourself With Good People

In the latest edition of Pro Remodeler, 2024 Remodeler of the Year Mike Pressgrove shares advice from his career.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jun 20, 2025

Single-family Construction Loan Volume Grows

Credit conditions for builders and developers eased in the first quarter of 2025 as the level of outstanding 1-4 family residential construction loans rose for the first time in two years, according to data released by FDIC.

Economics

Jun 18, 2025

The Fed Pause Continues

Reflecting most forecasters’ expectations for the June FOMC meeting, the Federal Reserve continued its post-2024 pause for federal funds rate cuts, retaining a target rate of 4.5% to 4.25%.

Economics

Jun 18, 2025

Sharp Drop in Multifamily Production Brings Overall Housing Starts Down

A sharp decline in multifamily production pushed overall housing starts down in May, while single-family output was essentially flat due to economic and tariff uncertainty along with elevated interest rates.