Recent Legal Action Fund Grants Help NAHB Members and HBAs in Big Cases
At the 2024 Fall Leadership Meeting, the NAHB Legal Action Committee recommended financial assistance through the Legal Action Fund for five cases, which the Board approved at its meeting.
Each case addresses an issue of national significance or a question that poses a common problem for NAHB members.
Land Use and Zoning Issues in Ohio
An NAHB member in Tallmadge, Ohio, owns large parcels of farmland, including a 124-acre tract. They worked with the city to create an R-6 zoning classification for high-density housing and applied to rezone their property.
Despite meeting all requirements, the city council denied the application because of local opposition to smaller lot sizes. The city council subsequently eliminated the R-6 zoning designation entirely.
The landowner filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Ohio, claiming a regulatory taking without just compensation, violation of equal protection, and retaliation. NAHB’s Legal Action Fund Grant will allow them to pursue a favorable judgment at the trial court or appellate court.
Land Use and Exaction Issues in Alabama and California
NAHB members in Alabama and California each won grants to support their challenges to the calculation and application of development impact fees that go beyond their stated purpose.
In Alabama, a developer is challenging disproportionate and unjustified fees along with unfair and unreasonable land use regulations that are driving up development costs and stunting the housing supply.
Since 2019, California has been seeking answers from the city of Coachella on its fee calculation, use and distribution of collected development impact fees. The NAHB member involved in the litigation argues that the city of Coachella is violating the state’s Mitigation Fee Act.
In each instance, NAHB’s Board recognized that continued delays in settling these matters are being used to stunt housing growth, as well as exhaust judicial support, and the grants will be used to advance the cases to conclusion.
Climate Change Regulation in Georgia
Georgia is ramping up to implement zero-emission requirements for homes that conflict with federal appliance standards. An NAHB member hopes to staunch the flow of regulatory overreach from spreading to other states.
NAHB’s Board recognized that without the support of the Legal Action Fund grant program, state and local regulations that exceed federal standards of compliance could potentially create financial and operational hardships on manufacturers, builders and ultimately home buyers.
NAHB will next consider Legal Action Fund applications at the International Builders’ Show in Las Vegas Feb. 25-27. Applications are due Wednesday, Feb. 5.
Latest from NAHBNow
Jul 03, 2025
Consumer Confidence Retreats in JuneAfter a strong rebound in May, consumer confidence resumed its downward trend in June. Consumers remain concerned about the economy and labor market amid ongoing uncertainty, especially around tariffs.
Jul 02, 2025
5 Proven Strategies Smart Builders Use to Grow in Any MarketSound Capital has worked with builders across market cycles for over 20 years. They have seen who thrived when others pulled back, and they've studied the strategies they used to scale while competitors were sidelined. Here are five things they all had in common.
Latest Economic News
Jul 03, 2025
Solid Job Growth in JuneThe U.S. labor market continued to show resilience in June, with steady job gains led by state/local government and health care sectors.
Jul 02, 2025
Two or More Story Home Starts Rebound in 2024Over half of new single-family homes built in 2024 were two or more stories, according the recent release of the Census Bureau’s Survey of Construction (SOC). After declining in 2023, the share of homes started with two or more stories increased again in 2024, continuing the upward trend in place since 2020.
Jul 01, 2025
May Private Residential Construction Spending DipsPrivate residential construction spending fell by 0.5% in May, marking the fifth straight month of decreases. This drop was primarily driven by reduced spending on single-family construction. Compared to a year ago, total spending was down 6.7%, as the housing sector continues to navigate the economic uncertainty stemming from ongoing tariff concerns and elevated mortgage rates.