Recent Legal Action Fund Grants Help NAHB Members and HBAs in Big Cases
At the 2024 Fall Leadership Meeting, the NAHB Legal Action Committee recommended financial assistance through the Legal Action Fund for five cases, which the Board approved at its meeting.
Each case addresses an issue of national significance or a question that poses a common problem for NAHB members.
Land Use and Zoning Issues in Ohio
An NAHB member in Tallmadge, Ohio, owns large parcels of farmland, including a 124-acre tract. They worked with the city to create an R-6 zoning classification for high-density housing and applied to rezone their property.
Despite meeting all requirements, the city council denied the application because of local opposition to smaller lot sizes. The city council subsequently eliminated the R-6 zoning designation entirely.
The landowner filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Ohio, claiming a regulatory taking without just compensation, violation of equal protection, and retaliation. NAHB’s Legal Action Fund Grant will allow them to pursue a favorable judgment at the trial court or appellate court.
Land Use and Exaction Issues in Alabama and California
NAHB members in Alabama and California each won grants to support their challenges to the calculation and application of development impact fees that go beyond their stated purpose.
In Alabama, a developer is challenging disproportionate and unjustified fees along with unfair and unreasonable land use regulations that are driving up development costs and stunting the housing supply.
Since 2019, California has been seeking answers from the city of Coachella on its fee calculation, use and distribution of collected development impact fees. The NAHB member involved in the litigation argues that the city of Coachella is violating the state’s Mitigation Fee Act.
In each instance, NAHB’s Board recognized that continued delays in settling these matters are being used to stunt housing growth, as well as exhaust judicial support, and the grants will be used to advance the cases to conclusion.
Climate Change Regulation in Georgia
Georgia is ramping up to implement zero-emission requirements for homes that conflict with federal appliance standards. An NAHB member hopes to staunch the flow of regulatory overreach from spreading to other states.
NAHB’s Board recognized that without the support of the Legal Action Fund grant program, state and local regulations that exceed federal standards of compliance could potentially create financial and operational hardships on manufacturers, builders and ultimately home buyers.
NAHB will next consider Legal Action Fund applications at the International Builders’ Show in Las Vegas Feb. 25-27. Applications are due Wednesday, Feb. 5.
Latest from NAHBNow
Jul 31, 2026
City Leaders Share Lessons on Breaking Through the Housing DebateMayors say collaboration and community engagement are key to building consensus across different perspectives to advance pro-housing policies.
Jul 30, 2026
AI Data Centers Are Outbidding Home Builders for America's LandAs the demand for data processing increased dramatically with the advent of AI, companies building the centers began bidding up prices of land that had been on home builders' radar.
Latest Economic News
Jul 30, 2026
PCE Inflation Eased in JuneAfter reaching a three-year high last month, the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge eased in June following declines in energy prices amid a temporary truce with Iran. This marked the first monthly decline in six years.
Jul 30, 2026
Top Ten Builder Share Across Largest Housing MarketsAn earlier post described how the top ten builders in the country accounted for 43.6% of new single-family closings in 2025. BUILDER magazine has now released additional data on the top ten builders within each of the 50 largest new home markets in the U.S., ranked by single-family permits.
Jul 29, 2026
Amid Supply-Side Inflation Pressures, The Fed HoldsThe Federal Reserve held the federal funds rate at a target range of 3.5% to 3.75% at the conclusion of its July policy meeting. There were three dissenting votes on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), all of which supported raising the federal funds rate by 25 basis points.