Just One More Week
 
Industry Pulse Check Closes June 15. Learn more
 

Student Designers Recognized at 2024 Solar Decathlon

Sustainability and Green Building
Published

The annual Solar Decathlon Competition was held April 19-21 at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colo. 

Students representing 37 collegiate institutions competed in the Design Challenge. After working for one to two semesters to design innovative and high-performance buildings that address current issues relating to climate change, affordability and environmental justice, these student design teams have the opportunity to present their ideas to expert jurors and network with industry professionals.

Heather Laminack of Ferrier Custom Homes — an NAHB member and former chair of the Sustainability and Green Building Subcommittee — attended the Solar Decathlon and served as a Design Challenge juror.

“While the 10 contests are the same, the approach and solutions the students presented varied greatly,” said Laminack. “A theme was that they were looking to not only create a zero-energy home, but to offer it as part of a broader social solution. We saw floating homes in Peru, infill homes aimed at first-time home buyers in Georgia, an affordable housing concept in South Africa, fire-resistant homes in Australia and British Columbia. These challenges are complex, and the students were resolute in their determination to find a better way.”

Winning teams are recognized with awards, and the grand winner was the University of Arizona, who competed in the Attached Housing Division. The team designed Harvest Mesa: 24 eco-friendly rowhouses that blend communal and private. The concept prioritized both the culture of the Hopi Tribe and modern innovation to offer energy-efficient, affordable housing.

NAHB has been a sponsor of the decathlon since 2004 and nearly every year since its inception.

“The entire event is brimming with excitement and passion,” said Laminack. “Students and faculty have invested countless hours of heart and hard work into their projects, and they are so proud to share their vision and strategy. There is a genuine curiosity the participants have — always looking to find ways to do build better, to serve more, all with less resources. That passion is infectious and an honor to be a part of.”

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Resiliency | Environmental Issues | Disaster Response

Jun 10, 2026

NAHB Urges Long-Term NFIP Reauthorization, Warns Against Privatization

In a joint letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, NAHB and the National Association of Realtors urged the secretaries, as co-chairs of the FEMA Review Council, to act on four key items related to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

Advocacy

Jun 10, 2026

Over 1,100 Housing Advocates Call on Congress to Address Affordability

More than 1,100 builders, remodelers and other housing industry professionals went to Capitol Hill today to call for congressional action to improve affordability and help builders to increase the production of affordable, attainable homes.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jun 11, 2026

Residential Building Material Prices Rise at Highest Rate In Over Three Years

Wholesale prices of goods used in residential construction rose in May as energy prices continued to climb.

Economics

Jun 10, 2026

Inflation Surpassed 4% in May

Inflation accelerated to a new three-year high in May, driven by continued increases in energy costs from the Iran war. Energy costs drove more than 60% of the monthly increase, with national gasoline prices jumping more than a dollar since the war began.

Economics

Jun 10, 2026

Home Building Regulatory Cost Burdens Increased 40% from 2021 to 2026

A new NAHB study shows that, on average, regulations imposed by government at all levels account for $131,734, or 26.4%, of the final price of a new single-family home built for sale. Of this amount, $46,795 is due to a higher price for the finished lot, attributable to regulations imposed during the lot’s development.