Just One More Week
 
Industry Pulse Check Closes June 15. Learn more
 

NAHB Identifies Post-Disaster Housing Challenges and Solutions During Industry Roundtable

Disaster Response
Published

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT) Humanitarian Supply Chain Lab has been working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to investigate ways to speed up the provision of immediate, temporary and permanent shelter after disasters. To do so, it has been reaching out to involved parties to help inform their understanding of the issues and challenges in order to shape their recommendations.

NAHB has been assisting MIT and FEMA in recent years to identify the challenges of meeting housing needs after a disaster has struck and what steps are needed to proactively address them. Additional partners include code experts, industry groups, and federal and state stakeholders.

On Jan. 29-30, 2024, MIT hosted a roundtable, Scaling Disaster Housing Capacity, as a follow-up to a virtual discussion that was held in May. Seven NAHB members and three staff participated in the meeting to identify opportunities for increasing capacity to rapidly deploy housing solutions after disasters, as well as policy and operational constraints that limit the implementation of those solutions.

NAHB participants included:

  • Geep Moore, Moore-Built Construction & Restoration, Elm Grove, LA
  • Tim Shigley, Shigley Construction Company Inc, Wichita, KS
  • Kenneth Estes, Estes Building & Remodeling, LLC, Saltillo, MS
  • Robert Criner, Criner Remodeling, Newport News, VA
  • Matt Belcher, Verda Solutions, St. Louis, MO
  • Ken Semler, Impresa Modular, Martinsburg, WV 
  • Harris Woodward, Finish Werks, Laurel, MD

These members specifically discussed remodeling/repair challenges with codes, FEMA’s 50% Rule, and financing and insurance issues, among others, while exploring increased the use of modular and panelized construction. Other participants included FEMA, Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Habitat for Humanity, International Code Council (ICC), and several state codes and emergency management personnel.

An MIT report regarding this discussion is expected by spring 2024. NAHB previously worked with MIT on its systems-built housing report, “Disaster Housing Construction Challenges in America: Exploring the Role of Factory-Built Housing.”

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Legal

Jun 11, 2026

Supreme Court Sides Against DOE Appliance Overreach

On June 8, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a D.C. Circuit Court ruling that would have allowed the Department of Energy (DOE) to effectively eliminate certain gas appliances from the market.

Resiliency | Environmental Issues | Disaster Response

Jun 10, 2026

NAHB Urges Long-Term NFIP Reauthorization, Warns Against Privatization

In a joint letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, NAHB and the National Association of Realtors urged the secretaries, as co-chairs of the FEMA Review Council, to act on four key items related to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jun 11, 2026

Residential Building Material Prices Rise at Highest Rate In Over Three Years

Wholesale prices of goods used in residential construction rose in May as energy prices continued to climb.

Economics

Jun 10, 2026

Inflation Surpassed 4% in May

Inflation accelerated to a new three-year high in May, driven by continued increases in energy costs from the Iran war. Energy costs drove more than 60% of the monthly increase, with national gasoline prices jumping more than a dollar since the war began.

Economics

Jun 10, 2026

Home Building Regulatory Cost Burdens Increased 40% from 2021 to 2026

A new NAHB study shows that, on average, regulations imposed by government at all levels account for $131,734, or 26.4%, of the final price of a new single-family home built for sale. Of this amount, $46,795 is due to a higher price for the finished lot, attributable to regulations imposed during the lot’s development.