Funding for Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has Consequences for Housing
In a case that could have significant repercussions for the housing industry, the U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 3 heard oral arguments in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) v. Community Financial Services Association of America.
The case centers on whether the way the CFPB receives its funding is a violation of the Appropriations Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Congress allows the CFPB to be funded through the Federal Reserve, rather than the annual appropriations process that determines the federal budget.
NAHB joined the Mortgage Bankers Association and the National Association of Realtors to file an amicus brief warning the Supreme Court that the “housing market could descend into chaos” if the high court unwittingly rejected numerous mortgage rules that NAHB’s members rely on to ensure people can purchase homes.
Our coalition’s brief focused on the remedy if the Supreme Court found against CFPB and did not make any arguments concerning the constitutionality of the funding scheme.
The attorneys for both parties received strong questioning from the justices concerning CFPB’s funding and how it could craft a remedy if it found the CFPB’s funding is unconstitutional. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar specifically mentioned NAHB’s brief when she suggested that the Supreme Court could address only the funding — and not the rules — that the CFPB has developed.
Moreover, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated her concern about the market disruption that would occur if the Supreme Court jettisoned the rules that the mortgage market relies on. The attorney for the Community Financial Services Association (CFSA) suggested that the Supreme Court could stay its decision and send the case to Congress so it could develop a different way to fund the CFPB.
In the end, both liberal and conservative justices seemed to have trouble understanding the CFSA’s argument that the CFPB funding scheme violated the Appropriations Clause. Justice Clarence Thomas specifically commented that it was not enough to argue that Congress has never funded an agency in this manner; there must be a reason why that violates the Constitution.
NAHB expects a decision by early 2024.
Latest from NAHBNow
Sep 15, 2025
The Impact of the Professional Women in Building Leadership GrantProfessional Women in Building's annual scholarhsip programs provide students and emerging professionals with the resources, support and opportunities they need to thrive and lead the housing industry.
Sep 15, 2025
Associate Award Winners Share Meaning Behind Their WinNAHB is excited to award two of the association's top Associate contributors each year for their achievements. Two previous winners reflect on their experiences.
Latest Economic News
Sep 12, 2025
Household Real Estate Asset Values Reach New HighThe market value of household real estate assets rose to $49.3 trillion in the second quarter of 2025, according to the most recent release of U.S. Federal Reserve Z.1 Financial Accounts. The value rose by 2.7% from the first quarter and is 1.1% higher than a year ago. This measure of market value estimates the value of all owner-occupied real estate nationwide.
Sep 11, 2025
Parking Trends in Newly Completed Single-Family Homes, 2024In 2024, 65% of newly completed single-family homes featured two-car garages, according to NAHB’s analysis of the Census’s Survey of Construction data. The share of new homes with three or more car garages stood at 15%, continuing a downward trend from its peak of 24% in 2015 and decreasing 2 percentage points from 2023.
Sep 10, 2025
Year-over-Year Building Material Price Growth AdvancesPrice growth for residential building materials rose for the fourth straight month in August, reaching its highest level since January 2023. Across domestic inputs goods and services into residential construction, service prices decreased in August while goods prices slightly advanced.