Funding for Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has Consequences for Housing

Legal
Published
Contact: Thomas Ward
[email protected]
VP, Legal Advocacy
(202) 266-8230

In a case that could have significant repercussions for the housing industry, the U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 3 heard oral arguments in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) v. Community Financial Services Association of America.

The case centers on whether the way the CFPB receives its funding is a violation of the Appropriations Clause of the U.S. Constitution. Congress allows the CFPB to be funded through the Federal Reserve, rather than the annual appropriations process that determines the federal budget.

NAHB joined the Mortgage Bankers Association and the National Association of Realtors to file an amicus brief warning the Supreme Court that the “housing market could descend into chaos” if the high court unwittingly rejected numerous mortgage rules that NAHB’s members rely on to ensure people can purchase homes.

Our coalition’s brief focused on the remedy if the Supreme Court found against CFPB and did not make any arguments concerning the constitutionality of the funding scheme.

The attorneys for both parties received strong questioning from the justices concerning CFPB’s funding and how it could craft a remedy if it found the CFPB’s funding is unconstitutional. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar specifically mentioned NAHB’s brief when she suggested that the Supreme Court could address only the funding — and not the rules — that the CFPB has developed.

Moreover, Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated her concern about the market disruption that would occur if the Supreme Court jettisoned the rules that the mortgage market relies on. The attorney for the Community Financial Services Association (CFSA) suggested that the Supreme Court could stay its decision and send the case to Congress so it could develop a different way to fund the CFPB.

In the end, both liberal and conservative justices seemed to have trouble understanding the CFSA’s argument that the CFPB funding scheme violated the Appropriations Clause. Justice Clarence Thomas specifically commented that it was not enough to argue that Congress has never funded an agency in this manner; there must be a reason why that violates the Constitution.

NAHB expects a decision by early 2024.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Economics

Apr 30, 2026

Fed Changes Leadership, but Powell Stays On Board

Fed Chair Jerome Powell is not expected to fully step away from the Federal Reserve. Instead, he plans to continue serving as a member of the Board of Governors as long as the Justice Department's probe into the cost of the Fed’s headquarters renovations remains active.

Workforce Development

Apr 29, 2026

Indiana Students Explore Career Paths Beyond a Four-Year Degree

The Builders Association of Elkhart County (Ind.) connects local students with hands‑on construction experiences that open their eyes to career paths beyond a four‑year degree.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Apr 30, 2026

U.S. Economy Rebounded in the First Quarter of 2026

Real GDP growth accelerated in the first quarter of 2026, rebounding from a weak finish at the end of 2025, as government spending recovered following a disruptive shutdown.

Economics

Apr 29, 2026

Powell’s Chair Ends but He Keeps His Board Seat

The April meeting of the Fed’s monetary policy committee featured a lot of institutional news for a month in which the Fed kept monetary policy unchanged. The outlook for the economy and monetary policy remains unclear due to geopolitical turbulence and domestic policy uncertainty.

Economics

Apr 29, 2026

Home Building Shows Signs of Stabilization with Monthly Gain in Starts

Housing construction activity strengthened in March, with a notable rebound in both single-family and multifamily starts, signaling improved builder activity despite ongoing headwinds from financing costs and affordability constraints. While the monthly gain points to renewed momentum, year-to-date trends remain mixed, particularly in the single-family sector, and permit activity suggests some caution moving forward.