More than 50 Lawmakers Express Concerns Over FEMA’s Flood Insurance Pricing
More than 50 House lawmakers have sent a letter to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Administrator Deanne Criswell expressing concerns over the National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP’s) new Risk Rating 2.0 mechanism that has resulted in increased premiums for millions of Americans.
Lawmakers are requesting information from FEMA on how the agency determines which communities are hit by flood insurance rate increases, asserting that the process “has been less than transparent” and that the “new methodology for determining risk and therefore policyholder premiums has accelerated home owners simply giving up and dropping their policies.”
NAHB has been advocating on Capitol Hill about the lack of transparency in setting flood insurance rate increases and we are pleased that lawmakers have responded positively and are sharing these concerns with the FEMA administrator.
Communities and home owners across the nation are being hit with rate hikes. In their letter to the FEMA director, House lawmakers noted that Louisiana Insurance Commissioner Jim Donelson stated: “Without changes to the NFIP’s plan, these premium increases will cause many Louisiana policy holders – especially lower income households in the most flood-prone areas – to drop their flood insurance altogether.”
The lawmakers noted that approximately 12,000 New Jersey policy holders have dropped their insurance since FEMA moved forward with Risk Rating 2.0 premium hikes and that it has been reported that 91% of Harris County, Texas home owners have seen a rate increase under Risk Rating 2.0.
“Home owners, particularly those who are financially vulnerable, need affordable flood insurance policies to protect against catastrophic financial loss when future storms befall,” the House letter stated. “Additionally, a precipitous drop in policyholders could lead to program insolvency.”
Members of Congress are calling on FEMA to provide lawmakers a briefing that addresses all factors taken into account in the Risk Rating 2.0 calculations as well as the stability and affordability of the NFIP.
Latest from NAHBNow
Feb 27, 2026
New Army Corps Initiative Will Streamline Permitting ProcessThe Army Corps of Engineers on Feb. 23 announced a new initiative called “Building Infrastructure, Not Paperwork” that the agency said will “shorten permitting timelines, and reduce or eliminate extraneous regulations and paperwork.”
Feb 27, 2026
Labor Department Proposes New FLSA Independent Contractor RuleThe U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) today published notice of its intent to revise its regulations that distinguish covered employees from exempt independent contractors for enforcement purposes under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and other laws.
Latest Economic News
Feb 27, 2026
Gains for Student Housing Construction in the Last Quarter of 2025Private fixed investment for student dormitories was up 1.5% in the last quarter of 2025, reaching a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of $3.9 billion. This gain followed three consecutive quarterly declines before rebounding in the final two quarters of the year.
Feb 27, 2026
Price Growth for Building Materials Slows to Start the YearResidential building material prices rose at a slower rate in January, according to the latest Producer Price Index release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This was the first decline in the rate of price growth since April of last year. Metal products continue to experience price increases, while specific wood products are showing declines in prices.
Feb 26, 2026
Home Improvement Loan Applications Moderate as Borrower Profile Gradually AgesHome improvement activity has remained elevated in the post-pandemic period, but both the volume of loan applications and the age profile of borrowers have shifted in notable ways. Data from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA), analyzed by NAHB, show that total home improvement loan applications have eased from their recent post-pandemic peak, and the distribution of borrowers across age groups has gradually tilted older.