More than 50 Lawmakers Express Concerns Over FEMA’s Flood Insurance Pricing

Environmental Issues
Published
Contact: Lake Coulson
[email protected]
SVP, Government Affairs & Chief Lobbyist

More than 50 House lawmakers have sent a letter to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Administrator Deanne Criswell expressing concerns over the National Flood Insurance Program’s (NFIP’s) new Risk Rating 2.0 mechanism that has resulted in increased premiums for millions of Americans.

Lawmakers are requesting information from FEMA on how the agency determines which communities are hit by flood insurance rate increases, asserting that the process “has been less than transparent” and that the “new methodology for determining risk and therefore policyholder premiums has accelerated home owners simply giving up and dropping their policies.”

NAHB has been advocating on Capitol Hill about the lack of transparency in setting flood insurance rate increases and we are pleased that lawmakers have responded positively and are sharing these concerns with the FEMA administrator.

Communities and home owners across the nation are being hit with rate hikes. In their letter to the FEMA director, House lawmakers noted that Louisiana Insurance Commissioner Jim Donelson stated: “Without changes to the NFIP’s plan, these premium increases will cause many Louisiana policy holders – especially lower income households in the most flood-prone areas – to drop their flood insurance altogether.”

The lawmakers noted that approximately 12,000 New Jersey policy holders have dropped their insurance since FEMA moved forward with Risk Rating 2.0 premium hikes and that it has been reported that 91% of Harris County, Texas home owners have seen a rate increase under Risk Rating 2.0.

“Home owners, particularly those who are financially vulnerable, need affordable flood insurance policies to protect against catastrophic financial loss when future storms befall,” the House letter stated. “Additionally, a precipitous drop in policyholders could lead to program insolvency.”

Members of Congress are calling on FEMA to provide lawmakers a briefing that addresses all factors taken into account in the Risk Rating 2.0 calculations as well as the stability and affordability of the NFIP.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Economics | Housing Affordability

Aug 21, 2025

New and Existing Homes Remain Largely Unaffordable in Second Quarter

While new homes remain largely unaffordable, builder efforts to improve housing affordability paid dividends in the second quarter of 2025, according to the latest data from the NAHB/Wells Fargo Cost of Housing Index (CHI). The CHI results from the second quarter of 2025 show that a family earning the nation’s median income of $104,200 needed 36% of its income to cover the mortgage payment on a median-priced new home. Low-income families, defined as those earning only 50% of median income, would have to spend 71% of their earnings to pay for the same new home.

Economics

Aug 20, 2025

Custom Home Building Grows as Broader Housing Market Struggles

An analysis of census data by NAHB economists shows that custom home building grew 4% in the second quarter of 2025 as high interest rates and home prices suppress demand for traditional spec home production.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Aug 21, 2025

Existing Home Sales Rise in July

Existing home sales rebounded in July as mortgage rates retreated from the recent peak and home price growth slowed, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

Economics

Aug 21, 2025

New and Existing Homes Remain Largely Unaffordable in Second Quarter

While new homes remain largely unaffordable, builder efforts to improve housing affordability paid dividends in the second quarter of 2025, according to the latest data from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Cost of Housing Index (CHI).

Economics

Aug 20, 2025

Retreat for Single-Family Built-for-Rent Housing

Single-family built-for-rent construction fell back in the second quarter, as a higher cost of financing crowded out development activity.