OMB Proposes New Standards on American-Made Building Materials

Economics
Published

In a move that could affect single-family and multifamily affordable housing projects, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has proposed new standards to determine if construction materials for federally funded infrastructure projects are made in the United States.

The new guidance, required by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, or BIL), “sets standards to carry out the statutory requirement that all manufacturing processes for construction material occur in the United States.” Federally funded infrastructure projects include housing developments that receive any federal support, such as through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) or the Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME).

Covered Construction Materials and Manufacturing Standards

The Build America, Buy America Act, which is part of the BIL, requires OMB to issue standards that define ‘‘all manufacturing processes’’ in the case of construction materials. Initial guidance (memorandum M–22–11) issued in April 2022 fell short of this and instead provided non-binding guidance on the definition of construction materials. The latest proposal includes an expanded list of products considered construction materials and proposes standards for ‘‘all manufacturing processes’’ for the manufacturing of construction materials.

Among construction materials covered by the guidance are lumber, drywall, glass and plastics. The guidance includes domestic manufacturing process standards for the following construction materials:

Public Comment Period

OMB has provided only 30 days to comment on the new standard. NAHB will submit comments as we believe that, under OMB’s proposal as written, virtually all housing development could be excluded. We have strongly urged HUD to exempt single-family and multifamily affordable housing projects from the Build America, Buy America Back Act mandates.

However, NAHB remains concerned that the “built in America” standards may stall road and utility projects funded by CDBG or HOME that are needed to allow housing development to take place.

NAHB Senior Economist David Logan provides more analysis in this Eye on Housing blog post.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Material Costs

Jan 02, 2026

Trump Delays Higher Tariffs on Furniture, Kitchen Cabinets for One Year

President Trump has announced he will be rolling back higher tariffs on furniture, kitchen cabinets and vanities that were set to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026, until Jan. 1, 2027.

Housing Finance

Jan 02, 2026

FHA’s MMI Fund Capital Ratio Remained Solid in Fiscal Year 2025

The capital reserve ratio for the Federal Housing Administration’s Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund ended the fiscal year at 11.47% — unchanged from the capital ratio for fiscal year 2024 and well above the congressionally mandated 2% capital ratio.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Dec 22, 2025

State-Level Employment Situation: September 2025

In September 2025, nonfarm payroll employment was largely unchanged across states on a monthly basis, with a limited number of states seeing statistically significant increases or decreases. This reflects generally stable job counts across states despite broader labor market fluctuations. The data were impacted by collection delays due to the federal government shutdown.

Economics

Dec 19, 2025

Existing Home Sales Edge Higher in November

Existing home sales rose for the third consecutive month in November as lower mortgage rates continued to boost home sales, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR). However, the increase remained modest as mortgage rates still stayed above 6% while down from recent highs. The weakening job market also weighed on buyer activity.

Economics

Dec 18, 2025

Lumber Capacity Lower Midway Through 2025

Sawmill production has remained essentially flat over the past two years, according to the Federal Reserve G.17 Industrial Production report. This most recent data release contained an annual revision, which resulted in higher estimates for both production and capacity in U.S. sawmills.