Brazilian Plywood Certifier Ordered to Revoke PS 1 Certificates and Grade Stamps

Legal
Published

On May 23, 2022, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida entered an order, reflecting an agreement of the parties, mandating that PFS TECO:

  • Revoke all the PS 1 certificates and grade stamps that PFS TECO has issued to plywood mills located in southern Brazil.
  • Remove all revoked PS 1 certificates from the PFS TECO website.

Also, per the order, PFS TECO is barred until this permanent injunction is lifted from issuing any PS 1 certificate or grade stamp to any plywood mill in Brazil.

The order grew out of a lawsuit filed in September 2019 by nine U.S. plywood producers alleging false advertising claims against PFS Corporation (PFS-TECO) and Timber Products Inspection, Inc. — two certifying agencies that issued PS 1-09 compliance certificates authorizing 35 Brazilian plywood plants to stamp plywood panels as meeting the PS 1-09 structural-grade requirements. The accrediting agency for both of the certifying agencies, International Accreditation Service, Inc., was also named in the suit.

The lawsuit asserted that:

  • Building codes adopted throughout the United States require that structural-grade plywood panels incorporated into the roofs, floors and walls of residential and commercial buildings in the United States meet the PS 1 -09 structural standards.
  • Tests by the American Plywood Association in 2018 and commissioned by the plaintiffs in 2019 showed that the Brazilian plywood panels produced in southern Brazil experienced massive failure rates with respect to the stringent strength properties of the PS 1 -09 standard, specifically bending stiffness and deflection.

On June 15, 2022, citing the order of the District Court, the Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources Board and Code Administration Division issued an advisory memo to all building officials in the County that “building officials and inspectors should be made aware of these inferior Brazilian plywood products bearing the PS 1 stamps and not accept these stamps as a means of indicating code compliance.”

Check with your local building official or local attorney if you have any questions.

The case is U.S. Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition v. PFS Corporation, United District Court for the Southern District of Florida, CASE NO. 19-62225-CIV-ALTMAN

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Business Management

May 26, 2026

NAHB Publication Offers Remodelers Sneak Peek into Industry Financials

BuilderBooks, the publishing arm of NAHB, released a new edition of its Remodelers’ Cost of Doing Business Study, 2026 Edition, a national study of remodelers’ business practices and financial performance.

Economics

May 22, 2026

Which Home Owners Are Fueling Today’s Remodeling Market?

With elevated mortgage rates and limited for-sale inventory making it harder to move, many home owners are instead choosing to invest in the homes they already own. In 2024, an estimated $670 billion was spent on remodeling projects.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

May 26, 2026

First Quarter 2026 Multifamily Construction Data

According to NAHB analysis of quarterly Census data, the count of multifamily, for-rent housing starts increased year-over-year during the first quarter of 2026. For the quarter, 107,000 multifamily residences started construction.

Economics

May 25, 2026

Custom Home Building – A Bright Spot for Construction

With overall single-family construction down 5% for the first four months of 2026, custom home building has been a relative bright spot. The custom building market is less sensitive to the interest rate cycle than other forms of home building but is more sensitive to changes in household wealth and stock prices.

Economics

May 25, 2026

Single-Family Built-to-Rent Slowed at Start of 2026

Single-family built-for-rent (or built-to-rent, BTR) construction fell back in the first quarter of 2026, as a higher cost of financing, increased multifamily supply and policy concerns over Congressional legislation related to institutional capital froze parts of the development market.