Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) have announced an agreement to address health care and climate change, raise taxes on high earners and large corporations and reduce the federal debt.
The measure includes a number of provisions that could affect the residential construction industry and NAHB members. In terms of funding, the bill provides $837 million to HUD for loans and direct grants to improve energy efficiency, water efficiency, and climate resilience of affordable housing.
It also includes funding for forestry measures, including fuels reduction and vegetation management. But there is concern these funds may be limited to use in the wildland-urban interface (WUI). Additionally, there is concern that funds designated for protecting old-growth forests will result in locking up U.S. Forest Service lands.
$1 Billion In Grants for Advancing Energy Codes
While NAHB supports the adoption of cost-effective, modern energy codes, we oppose these grant programs as they lack flexibility and consideration of overall performance to account for local conditions when adopting the 2021 edition of the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). $1 billion will be made available to state and local governments to adopt advanced energy codes.
- $330 million of these funds will be targeted toward the adoption of energy codes that meet or exceed the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for residential buildings and the ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standards 90.1-2019 for commercial buildings.
- $670 million of these funds will go toward the adoption of energy codes for residential and commercial buildings that meet or exceed the zero energy provisions in the 2021 IECC or an equivalent stretch code.
- Overall, this is $700 million more than was proposed for such programs in Build Back Better (BBB).
NAHB is concerned regarding the grant programs that promote the adoption of several provisions in the 2021 IECC that do not meet cost-effectiveness criteria for the consumer and provisions for zero energy buildings, as included in the appendix to the 2021 IECC. These zero-energy targets are not appropriate or cost-effective for many jurisdictions. Furthermore, the adoption of these provisions will exacerbate the current housing affordability crisis and limit energy choices for consumers. Rather, the Department of Energy should help states advance the codes in a manner that best fits the needs of state and local governments.
Other codes-related issues in the bill:
- No funding is tied to adoption of the "latest published editions" of the code as was one of the FEMA programs in BBB.
- $4.3 billion for the HOMES Rebate Program is an energy efficiency retrofit program
- $4.275 billion for the high-efficiency electric home rebate program is a program for home owners and landlords for qualifying electrification projects, like installing an electric heat pump.
Some of the biggest effects in the legislation appear to be in the its tax provisions. Looking first at what is "in" the bill:
Carried interest. For taxpayers earning more than $400k, the holding period increases from three to five years. However, income that is attributable to a real property trade or business retains a three-year holding period. The bill also makes other changes to this section of the tax code which might affect certain partnerships, including real estate.
15% corporate minimum tax. This applies to companies with an average adjusted financial statement income over $1 billion that don’t currently pay a 15% rate.Includes protections to preserve the value of tax credits like LIHTC.
Section 45L New Energy Efficient Home Credit. The bill would extend the 45L credit until Dec. 31, 2032. This credit expired at the end of 2021. The bill would first extend the credit for one year — until De. 31, 2022 — as a $2,000 credit with the same qualification requirements as existed in 2021. After Dec. 31, 2022, the pathway to qualify for the credit would be completely revised. NAHB opposes these changes.
Beginning in 2023, to qualify for 45L, the dwelling unit must be eligible to participate in the Energy Star Residential New Construction Program or the Energy Star Manufactured New Homes program. Qualifying units would be eligible for an increased credit amount of $2,500. Units that are certified as zero energy ready homes under the Department of Energy program are eligible for a $5,000 credit.
Section 25C Nonbusiness Energy Property Credit. The legislation includes a consumer-focused credit used to incentivize energy efficient retrofits. It would extend the credit until Dec. 31, 2032. It would also make many improvements to the credit, including increasing the maximum credit allowed to $1,200 and eliminating the lifetime cap.
Section 25D Residential Clean Energy Credit. This is a consumer-focused credit for installing solar electric, solar water heating, fuel cells, small wind, biomass fuel stove, and geothermal heat pumps. The credit is currently scheduled to phase-out after 2023. The bill would extend the credit through the end of 2034. It would also make battery storage technology eligible for the credit.
179D Energy Efficient Commercial Buildings Deduction. This is an existing deduction to incentivize energy efficient commercial buildings, including residential buildings built to the commercial code. It modifies the deduction to provide a sliding scale to qualify; the deduction has been criticized for being too difficult to qualify for.
The bill also eliminates the basis reduction requirement when calculating eligible basis under Section 42, which is a positive change for LIHTC projects.
What tax provision are not included in the bill?
Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT). This measure would have extended the 3.8% NIIT to active investors, including NAHB members. The NIIT applies to capital gains and rental income, among other investment streams, and would have directly increased the cost of housing. NAHB pushed back hard against this proposal.
Qualified Contracts. Previous versions of this bill would have retroactively changed the LIHTC program to eliminate qualified contracts. NAHB opposed retroactive changes of this nature, and it was not included in the bill.
The Senate could vote on matter as early as next week. A House vote would follow, perhaps later this month. Republicans in both chambers are expected to oppose the legislation.
This is a preliminary analysis of the legislation; NAHB will continue to analyze the legislation and provide further updates.