NAHB Supports GOP Efforts to Halt WOTUS Rulemaking Pending Supreme Court Decision
This post was updated on March 9.
In a move supported by NAHB, all 50 Republican senators have signed onto a letter to request that the Environmental Protection Agency halt its “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rulemaking while the Supreme Court considers a case brought by Idaho couple Chantell and Mike Sackett on the Clean Water Act (CWA).
More than 200 GOP House members sent a similar letter to EPA Administrator Michael Regan on March 8 urging the agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to halt rulemaking until the Supreme Court rules on the case.
“Any future rulemaking must be based on fully informed legal guidance,” the House letter stated. “The Agencies’ goal of developing a lasting rule can only be achieved if appropriate legal standards are met, and it is premature to develop a new rule until the (Supreme) Court’s Sackett opinion is issued.”
The Sackett case’s focus on legality of the “significant nexus” standard used by federal regulators to assert federal jurisdiction over any non-navigable, isolated, wetlands and even intermittent and ephemeral streams and ditches could have major implications for the CWA’s permitting and enforcement programs.
The Senate letter stated that “proceeding with the rulemaking at this time, despite the pending litigation and potential influential verdict, will only deepen uncertainty within the regulated community.”
Like NAHB, House and Senate GOP lawmakers are also very critical of the WOTUS rule as it is currently proposed.
“Given the severe financial penalties stakeholders could face for conducting standard agricultural or other land development practices under the proposed rule, family farmers and ranchers are understandably alarmed by the administration’s attempted land grab,” the Senate lawmakers stated.
“The rule takes a new and expansive approach to the definition of WOTUS, creating additional costs and burdens for regulated stakeholders,” House lawmakers told the EPA administrator.
The EPA and Corps announced that as of Sept. 3, the agencies have halted implementation of the Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR) and are interpreting WOTUS consistent with the pre-2015 regulatory regime until further notice.
This unilateral decision by the agencies — without public input — means that landowners must immediately follow the federal definition of WOTUS that existed prior to both the Trump and Obama administration’s WOTUS rules.
While the agencies reiterated their commitment to change the regulatory definition of WOTUS under the CWA announced in June, that effort is expected to take more than six months to complete.
NAHB Senior Officers, members and HBA staff testified at a series of hearings throughout last August and more recently last month to voice their support for retaining the NWPR’s requirement that jurisdictional features have a direct surface water connection to a navigable water, as well as other readily identifiable landscape features upon which the scope of federal jurisdiction is based.
By contrast the proposed WOTUS rule would revert back using the same controversial, cumbersome, and inconsistently applied “significant nexus” approach that the Supreme Court has identified as warranting legal review under the Sackett case.
The regulated community faces significant regulatory uncertainty in light of the agencies’ decision, as sections of the pre-2015 rules have been found unlawful by the courts, and the guidance documents provided by the agencies have been superseded by more current guidance.
NAHB is exploring all options to limit this federal overreach, as well as the challenges the EPA’s and the Corps’ proposed rule’s approach will create. We will continue to keep members updated on further developments and provide additional guidance once it becomes available.
Meanwhile, builders who have received, or are in the process of applying for federal wetlands permits or jurisdictional determinations, are encouraged to visit nahb.org/wotus to access NAHB’s guidance to frequently asked questions to help navigate the current landscape.
Latest from NAHBNow
Oct 09, 2025
3 Ways to Utilize Construction Site Surroundings to Optimize DesignHome design isn’t just about color swatches and backsplashes. Architecturally, building professionals can look toward climate responsive design and ambient design, which both involve using the elements around a home to the client’s advantage.
Oct 09, 2025
Remodeling Market Sentiment Improves in Third QuarterNAHB released its NAHB/Westlake Royal Remodeling Market Index (RMI) for the third quarter, posting a reading of 60, up one point compared to the previous quarter. With the reading of 60, the RMI remains solidly in positive territory above 50, but lower than it had been at any time from 2021 through 2024.
Latest Economic News
Oct 07, 2025
Minority-Owned Residential Building Firms Continue to RiseThe share of minority-owned new residential builders and remodelers has more than doubled since the Great Recession, with noticeable gains from 2017 to 2022. Nevertheless, when compared to the overall U.S. population, minority-owned firms continue to be underrepresented within both housing sectors.
Oct 06, 2025
Shorter Apartment Construction Time in 2024The average time needed to complete construction of a multifamily building after obtaining authorization edged down in 2024, according to the 2024 Survey of Construction (SOC) from the Census Bureau. On average, it took 19.6 months from permit to completion, about 0.3 months shorter than in 2023.
Oct 03, 2025
Supply-Side Cost Pressures Drove Housing as Inflation Leader in 2024Though the rate of inflation peaked in June 2022, consumer prices continued to increase throughout 2023 and 2024 as inflation drove further price growth, according to 2024 CPI review from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.