With WOTUS Under Attack, NAHB Members Voice Support for 2020 Rule
The U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona on Monday issued a ruling on the Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR), which defines the “waters of the U.S. (WOTUS).” The court remanded and vacated the rule, but the scope of the decision is not clear.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has yet to respond to the court’s ruling, and NAHB has requested EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) provide guidance on what version of the federal definition of WOTUS applies in the interim.
Following the ruling, NAHB Chairman Chuck Fowke issued a statement:
“NAHB is disappointed by the recent ruling against the Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The NWPR provides a clear definition of waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and better enables stakeholders to discern which waters fall under federal jurisdiction. This ruling is contrary to prior federal court decisions and will lead to more confusion over what features are jurisdictional, resulting in longer delays and higher housing costs.”
The ruling comes after the Biden administration announced its intent to change the regulatory definition of WOTUS under the Clean Water Act (CWA) in June. In response, NAHB Senior Officers, members and HBA staff participated throughout August in a series of virtual listening sessions held by EPA and the Corps to hear stakeholder feedback on these changes.
During the virtual hearings, NAHB representatives from across the country highlighted how aspects of the current WOTUS regulatory definition provide far greater regulatory clarity regarding what features are subject to CWA jurisdiction and what isolated or ephemeral features can, if needed, be regulated by the states.
“The current WOTUS definition is easy to understand and clearly specifies what features are jurisdictional. This regulation protects the critical waters that are connected and/or adjacent to navigable waters, which is clearly the charge of the federal government,” testified NAHB Life Delegate Jim McCulley, owner of Watershed Eco, an environmental consulting firm in Middletown, Del., during the Aug. 25 hearing.
NAHB thanks the members who testified, including NAHB’s Senior Officers and members Drew Smith, Sarasota, Fla.; Jeff Thomas, Fort Wayne, Ind.; Rick Wajda, Indiana Builders Association; and Scott Peterson, Phoenix, Ariz.
In addition to these listening sessions, the agencies intend to host regional roundtables in the fall to gather additional input. We will share additional information about how members can participate in the roundtables when it becomes available.
Learn more on this issue at the WOTUS page on nahb.org.
Latest from NAHBNow
Aug 01, 2025
Meet at Home with Your Members of CongressNAHB members across the nation can build on the success of the June Legislative Conference by meeting with their lawmakers in their home districts in August to discuss key issues that affect the home building industry.
Jul 31, 2025
How Home Builders Beat the Labor Crunch with This Fast Financing PlanStruggling to secure labor can force builders to make tough decisions: Do you delay a project? Sacrifice profits? Or turn down new opportunities? But smart builders don’t just react — they adapt their financing strategy to meet labor challenges head-on.
Latest Economic News
Jul 31, 2025
Personal Income Rises 0.3% in JunePersonal income increased by 0.3% in June, following a 0.4% dip in May, according to the latest data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. The gains in personal income were largely driven by higher wages and social benefits.
Jul 31, 2025
Housing Share of GDP: Second Quarter 2025Housing’s share of the economy registered 16.3% in the second quarter of 2025, according to the advance estimate of GDP produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. This reading is unchanged from a revised level of 16.3% in the first quarter and is the same as the share one year ago.
Jul 30, 2025
Fed Remains on Pause AgainAt the conclusion of its July meeting, the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy committee once again held the federal funds rate constant at a top rate of 4.5%. However, two members of the committee dissented from the decision (Fed Board Governors Waller and Bowman), the largest number of dissenting votes since 1993.