U.S. Supreme Court Embraces Property Owner’s Right to Exclude

Legal
Published

The U.S. Supreme Court today issued a Fifth Amendment “takings” decision that is a win for property owners. The Fifth Amendment provides that the government may not take private property unless it pays the owner just compensation.

In this case, a California regulation granted labor organizers a right to access a farmer’s property to solicit support for unionization. The regulation allowed the organizers access for up to three hours a day, 120 days per year. The farmer argued that allowing the organizers on their property was an unconstitutional “physical taking” of their property.

The majority of the Supreme Court agreed. Chief Justice John Roberts, joined by five other justices, explained that the a “central importance” of property ownership is the “right to exclude” others.

The lower court and the dissent took the view that the regulation did not cause a ”physical taking“ because it did not allow a permanent and continuous invasion (24 hours a day, 365 days per year) of the farmer’s property.

The Supreme Court majority tore apart this argument by explaining that it does not matter if the government only invades a person’s property for 364 days, instead of 365 days; the fact that the invasion is from time to time does not make it any less physical.

In its conclusion, the Supreme Court did recognize that not all government invasions of private property require compensation. It provided examples of making an arrest, requiring a landowner to provide access in exchange for a permit, or abating a nuisance on private property. None of these amount to a taking of private property.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Economics | Housing Affordability

Aug 21, 2025

New and Existing Homes Remain Largely Unaffordable in Second Quarter

While new homes remain largely unaffordable, builder efforts to improve housing affordability paid dividends in the second quarter of 2025, according to the latest data from the NAHB/Wells Fargo Cost of Housing Index (CHI). The CHI results from the second quarter of 2025 show that a family earning the nation’s median income of $104,200 needed 36% of its income to cover the mortgage payment on a median-priced new home. Low-income families, defined as those earning only 50% of median income, would have to spend 71% of their earnings to pay for the same new home.

Economics

Aug 20, 2025

Custom Home Building Grows as Broader Housing Market Struggles

An analysis of census data by NAHB economists shows that custom home building grew 4% in the second quarter of 2025 as high interest rates and home prices suppress demand for traditional spec home production.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Aug 21, 2025

Existing Home Sales Rise in July

Existing home sales rebounded in July as mortgage rates retreated from the recent peak and home price growth slowed, according to the National Association of Realtors (NAR).

Economics

Aug 21, 2025

New and Existing Homes Remain Largely Unaffordable in Second Quarter

While new homes remain largely unaffordable, builder efforts to improve housing affordability paid dividends in the second quarter of 2025, according to the latest data from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB)/Wells Fargo Cost of Housing Index (CHI).

Economics

Aug 20, 2025

Retreat for Single-Family Built-for-Rent Housing

Single-family built-for-rent construction fell back in the second quarter, as a higher cost of financing crowded out development activity.