The Value of Third-Party Inspections

Sustainability and Green Building
Published

Do third-party green building inspections actually add value to projects? A recent study by SK Collaborative set out to answer this question by analyzing 10 recently constructed or renovated multifamily affordable housing projects in Georgia, all of which received Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) awards.

The ICC-700 National Green Building Standard® (NGBS), like most other voluntary green building programs, requires third-party verification for certification. These inspections typically happen mid-construction, immediately following insulation, and again when construction is substantially complete. Half of the projects that the team analyzed pursued green building certification, and half elected to only meet the state Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) prescriptive requirements for duct and envelope tightness and required sustainability items.

The results provide insight on the importance of green certification third-party inspections.

Assumptions and Limitations

Green building certification is a process that begins long before the first site inspection. Projects undergo a design review meeting with the primary development and construction team, a construction kickoff meeting with all key contractors, and detailed plan and construction specification reviews before a green verifier ever steps foot on a project site. Issues identified prior to inspection, either through document review or project team meetings, were not included in SK Collective's analysis.

The analysis did, however, identify a number of deficiencies and failures uncovered during the inspection process, which have been grouped by type. For example, insulation failures were counted as one item, even though there may have been multiple insulation-related problems in a single project. Builders and trade contractors are typically present during the inspection, allowing them to make corrections identified during site visits. These issues may be remediated on site, and do not show up as failures on the inspection reports or in the results included here.

Projects Seeking Green Building Certification

Of the five projects that opted for green certification, the programs selected included NGBS, Enterprise Green Communities and EarthCraft Multifamily. On average, seven failures were found at the first mid-construction inspection and six failures at the initial final inspection.

Many of the issues were also building code failures overlooked by local officials, such as missing or incomplete envelope air sealing and poorly installed or completely missing insulation. These items are required by International Residential Code (IRC), International Fire Code (IFC) and International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). Some projects had incomplete duct sealing and excessive duct leakage. Projects were also frequently in violation of Georgia sedimentation and erosion control requirements, which are enforced by green building programs.

Green building program-specific failures included poorly installed HVAC ductwork (excessive bends and crimps), non-specified HVAC filter installed, no rodent or pest screens over ventilation openings, and missing dampers on bath exhaust ductwork.

Projects Not Seeking Green Building Certification

For the new construction projects, the QAP required minimum energy code compliance and a short list of prescriptive sustainability measures, such as ENERGY STAR-qualified bath exhaust fans.  The new construction projects had an average of three failures at mid-construction and one at final.

For the renovation projects, the applicable QAP required compliance with the energy code for new construction or achieving a 20% percent reduction in duct and/or envelope leakage. The renovation projects had an average of two failures at mid-construction and one at final.

Third-Party Inspections Can Eliminate Long-Term Issues

Projects pursuing green building certification had more failures, but that's not surprising as there are significantly more compliance items. What's not as obvious in the data is that the projects seeking green building certification tended to have a much smoother path to compliance.

All projects struggled with basic energy code requirements such as properly installed insulation and air sealing. If these failures had remained, residents would likely have experienced higher utility bills in less comfortable homes. Property management and owners would likely have faced maintenance problems and resident complaints. For all of these projects, third-party verification was a critical piece in finding and addressing these issues before project completion, thereby avoiding long-term problems that would have had a direct impact on residents.

Abe Kruger honed his expertise in sustainable construction over the last 16 years as a contractor, educator and consultant in the construction industry. He is the cofounder of SK Collaborative, which provides green building, healthy housing and building envelope consulting. SK Collaborative is currently certifying more than 20,000 units of single- and multifamily housing across the country.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Membership | Advocacy

Jul 02, 2025

From Disaster Relief to Challenging Gas Bans, HBAs are Making a Difference

Nearly two dozen HBAs received Association Excellence Awards for outstanding contributions they made on behalf of their members and communities in 2024.

Advocacy

Jul 01, 2025

One Big Beautiful Bill Act Will Spur Economic Growth

NAHB Chairman Buddy Hughes issued the following statement after the Senate passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jul 02, 2025

Two or More Story Home Starts Rebound in 2024

Over half of new single-family homes built in 2024 were two or more stories, according the recent release of the Census Bureau’s Survey of Construction (SOC). After declining in 2023, the share of homes started with two or more stories increased again in 2024, continuing the upward trend in place since 2020.

Economics

Jul 01, 2025

May Private Residential Construction Spending Dips

Private residential construction spending fell by 0.5% in May, marking the fifth straight month of decreases. This drop was primarily driven by reduced spending on single-family construction. Compared to a year ago, total spending was down 6.7%, as the housing sector continues to navigate the economic uncertainty stemming from ongoing tariff concerns and elevated mortgage rates.

Economics

Jul 01, 2025

Flat Job Openings for Construction

The count of open, unfilled positions in the construction industry held steady amid a slowdown for housing, per the May Bureau of Labor Statistics Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS).