How Likely Are Builders to Adopt Building Systems?
Building systems have been a tenured history, but despite touting benefits such as decreased time, labor and materials, builders generally have been slow to incorporate them into their businesses.
Home Innovation Research Labs has been tracking the adoption of offsite housing in new single-family homes and multifamily projects for the past 20 years. The multifamily market has more readily incorporated offsite building methods than the single-family market, with a noticeable uptick in both in recent years. But even with this growth, as well as an increase in the number of concrete-framed homes, building systems still comprise only a sliver of the housing market.
So what are the barriers to more widespread adoption?
A survey by Home Innovations Research Labs last week points to uncertainty as a predominant factor among builders who are leaning away from offsite construction.
"There is a high degree of uncertainty in home building right now," shared Ed Hudson, MBA, director of Market Research at Home Innovation Research Labs. "Construction times are lengthening, supply chains have been disrupted, and labor supplies are less reliable than they had been in the past. With all that uncertainty, introducing offsite would be another big uncertainty to add to their business."
Last week's survey incorporated three additional questions related to COVID-19 and how the impact of the pandemic on builders' operations may have altered their attitudes about offsite. The majority — 72% — responded that their attitudes had not changed, while 9% said the current environment had caused them to lean away from offsite construction. Those whose attitudes leaned more favorably to offsite construction represented 19% of respondents.
Among the top reasons builders are responding more favorably to offsite construction in the wake of the pandemic include:
- Utilizing factory-built components should make it easier to practice social distancing on the job site.
- Reduced contact with builders, suppliers and vendors, and distancing of trade contractors on site reduces risks.
- The new building environment is more complex, which could be resolved with the more predictable process of offsite construction.
- As lumber and other supplies diminish and materials prices increase, offsite construction offers an opportunity to bring some cost control back to the industry.
Hudson will present the full findings of the survey, as well as comparisons to historical data and comparable surveys in 2020 and 2019, as part of the Building Systems Week webinar series to highlight trends in the industry. Learn more here.
Latest from NAHBNow
Nov 25, 2025
Fannie, Freddie Multifamily Loan Purchase Caps to Rise 20% in 2026The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced yesterday that the 2026 multifamily loan purchase caps for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be $88 billion each, for a combined total of $176 billion to support the multifamily market — a 20.5% increase from 2025.
Nov 24, 2025
Young Adults Are Once Again Moving Back HomeThe share of young adults living with their parents increased in 2024, interrupting the post-pandemic trend of individuals ages 18-34 moving out of parental homes.
Latest Economic News
Nov 26, 2025
Property Taxes by State – 2024Nationally, across the 87 million owner-occupied homes in the U.S., the average amount of annual real estate taxes paid in 2024 was $4,271, according to NAHB analysis of the 2024 American Community Survey.
Nov 25, 2025
Share of New Homes with Decks Edges LowerThe share of new homes with decks edged down from 17.6% in 2023 to a new all-time low of 17.4% in 2024, according to NAHB tabulation of data from the HUD/Census Bureau Survey of Construction (SOC).
Nov 25, 2025
Building Material Prices Continued to Rise in SeptemberAggregate residential building material prices rose at their fastest pace since January 2023 in the latest Producer Price Index release from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Input energy prices increased for the first time in over a year, while service price growth remained lower than goods.