EPA Releases Plan to Reduce TSCA Fees Burden

Codes and Standards
Published

At NAHB ’s urging, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on March 25 made a significant announcement affecting how our members will be impacted by implementation of the Toxic Substance Control ACT (TSCA) Fees Rule. As NAHBNow reported last week the broad definition of the term “manufacturer” under the rule had the potential to impose a regulatory burden on certain NAHB members.

Currently, manufacturers subject to the requirements of the TSCA Fees Rule would include importers of articles containing a chemical undergoing risk evaluation. This means that retailers, distributors or wholesalers of potentially covered products who import items such as composite wood flooring or cabinets would be required to self-identify under the regulation.

However, after NAHB and other stakeholders reached out to EPA, the agency swiftly responded to address our concerns. EPA announced it intends to propose exemptions to the TSCA Fees rule and the proposed exemptions will cover three categories of manufacturers subject to EPA-initiated Risk Evaluation fees and associated requirements:

1) importers of articles containing one of the twenty high-priority substances;

2) producers of one of the twenty high-priority substances as a byproduct; and

3) producers or importers of one of the twenty high-priority substances as an impurity.

While EPA intends to issue the proposed amendments to the current fees rule later this year, tit does not anticipate finalizing the amendments until 2021. In acknowledgement of the need to bridge the gap between the current self-identification action and finalization of the planned regulatory change, EPA also announced a “No Action Assurance” under its enforcement discretion.

This means that the agency will not pursue enforcement action against entities in the three categories proposed for exemption for failure to self-identify under the TSCA Fee Rule. EPA does not expect entities that fall into one of these three categories take any further action if they were both not identified on a preliminary list and have not yet self-identified.

EPA has published additional information on its website for action related to the TSCA Fees Rule implementation including a FAQ to on both the proposed amendments and No Action Assurance.

For more information on implementation of the TSCA Fees Rule, contact Tamra Spielvogel at 800-368-5242 x8327.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Advocacy

Jun 16, 2026

Podcast: How Missing Middle Housing Can Help Close Affordability Gap

On the latest episode of NAHB’s podcast, Housing Developments, CEO Jim Tobin and COO Paul Lopez are joined by NAHB member Justin Wood, a West Coast builder, to discuss how he is navigating the current market in Oregon and Washington state, and what solutions have been successful.

Economics

Jun 16, 2026

May Housing Starts Fall as Multifamily Construction Slows Sharply

Overall housing starts decreased 15.4% in May to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.18 million units, according to a report from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jun 16, 2026

Housing Starts Weaken in May as Multifamily Construction Slows

Housing starts fell sharply in May, driven by a steep drop in multifamily construction. Meanwhile, single-family buildings also slipped amid high interest rates, rising construction costs and ongoing labor shortages.

Economics

Jun 15, 2026

Builder Sentiment Remains Weak Amid Affordability Concerns

Builder sentiment remains subdued as rising material costs, elevated mortgage rates and ongoing affordability challenges continue to strain the housing market.

Economics

Jun 12, 2026

Single-Family Permits Continue to Decline Through April as Multifamily Activity Strengthens

Through April 2026, residential construction activity remained uneven across housing sectors. Single-family permitting continued to soften compared with a year ago, reflecting persistent affordability challenges and elevated borrowing costs, while multifamily permitting posted solid gains supported by stronger activity in several regions.