NAHB Supports Proposed WOTUS Rule, Seeks Key Clarifications

Environment
Published

NAHB submitted comments yesterday to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) in response to the Trump administration's proposed definition of "waters of the United States" (WOTUS).

2019 NAHB Chairman Greg Ugalde summarized the views of NAHB, developers and builders by saying NAHB "largely supports the proposal and appreciates the efforts of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to further refine the limits of federal authority and ensure the rule is clear, understandable and workable."

The proposed rule would clarify the extent of federal oversight and correct the vast overreach of prior rules. Once finalized, builders and developers will be better able to determine for themselves whether they will need federal permits for construction activities. And, because the rule narrows the extent of federal jurisdiction by excluding isolated water bodies, "ephemeral" waters that only form in response to rain, and most ditches, builders should require fewer Clean Water Act permits for isolated or temporary wetlands or water bodies.

NAHB's comments included many suggestions on how to clarify the proposed rule and thereby help developers, builders and other landowners to implement the proposed rule’s requirements in the field. For example, NAHB asked the agencies to clarify how landowners should identify excluded ephemeral waters, calculate the amount of rainfall necessary to render a water body jurisdictional, and limit the period of time allowed to determine whether a ditch is man-made or natural. Many state and local associations and NAHB members also provided their own comments on the proposed rule.

In addition, NAHB members provided testimony during several field hearings on the proposal including Feb. 27-28 in Kansas City, and small business roundtable hearings by the U.S. Small Business Administration in Denver on March 27 and Tampa on April 4. Though the proposal marks a milestone in the effort to better define WOTUS, NAHB also asked the agencies to act quickly to rescind the problematic prior 2015 rule.

EPA and the Corps will now review all comments submitted during the comment period, and revise the proposed rule before issuing a final rule.

NAHB will continue to provide input to the agencies during that process and keep members informed of any developments.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Membership | Advocacy

Mar 25, 2026

Podcast: 3 Key Focus Areas for NAHB’s Blueprint to 100

On the latest episode of NAHB’s podcast, Housing Developments, CEO Jim Tobin and COO Paul Lopez sit down with 2026 NAHB Chairman Bill Owens to discuss his plans for the year, including the Blueprint to 100 initiative, and what’s happening in Washington.

Education

Mar 24, 2026

5 Courses to Boost Your Business' Profitability this Spring

Now is a critical time for builders to tactfully manage their budgets and strategically plan for the future to put themselves in the best position for success. NAHB will host several live online courses this spring that will focus on helping builders thrive by refining their skills in estimating, communicating, designing and more.

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Mar 25, 2026

Age of Housing Stock by State

According to the latest data from the 2024 American Community Survey (ACS), the median age of owner-occupied homes has reached 42 years old. The age of the housing stock is an important remodeling market indicator.

Economics

Mar 24, 2026

Almost Half of the Owner-Occupied Homes Built Before 1980

Around 47% of the U.S. housing stock was built in the 1980s and earlier. The median age of owner-occupied homes climbed to 42 years old in 2024, up from 31 in 2005 according to the latest data from the American Community Survey.

Economics

Mar 23, 2026

Comparing New and Resale Prices: 4Q25

In the fourth quarter of 2025, the median price for a new single-family home was $405,300, which was $9,600 lower than the median price of an existing home, which stood at $414,900.