OSHA Issues Final Rule on Injury and Illness Reporting Requirements

Safety
Published

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) late last week issued a final rule eliminating a requirement that establishments with 250 or more employees electronically submit information from certain OSHA forms.

These companies will no longer be required to electronically submit information on OSHA’s Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses form (Form 300) and Injury and Illness Incident Report form (Form 301). They are, however, still required to electronically submit information from the Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses form (Form 300A). The final rule becomes effective Feb. 25, 2019.

Collection of 2018 information from the OSHA Form 300A began on Jan. 2, 2019. The deadline for electronic submissions is March 2, 2019.

OSHA noted that by preventing routine government collection of information that may be quite sensitive, including descriptions of workers’ injuries and body parts affected, the agency is avoiding the risk that such information might be publicly disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

While NAHB generally supported OSHA’s position on Forms 300 and 301, NAHB believes that the agency did not go far enough in addressing significant issues associated with the previous rulemaking. The final rule does not address stakeholder concerns that the existing requirement to submit OSHA 300A Summary Forms includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) that must also be protected from public release. CBI is highly valuable to employers and must be protected in some fashion from public release. During the rulemaking, NAHB urged OSHA to rescind its submission requirements for 300A Summary Forms.

NAHB also disagrees with OSHA’s decision to require employers to include their Employee Identification Number (EIN) in the submission of the OSHA 300A Summary Forms. The agency’s desire to require the submission of the EIN for enforcement and research purposes is not outweighed by the potential for fraud exacted upon employers through the public release or availability of the EIN.

Notably, OSHA attempted to exclude public comments on problematic areas of the original Electronic Recordkeeping rule and failed to address stakeholder concerns about those provisions here.

The compliance date for the EIN submission is March 2, 2020, for 2019 Form 300A submissions.

NAHB is a party to active litigation on some of these objections and we hope to see a positive outcome to protect the confidentiality and privacy of NAHB members.

Subscribe to NAHBNow

Log in or create account to subscribe to notifications of new posts.

Log in to subscribe

Latest from NAHBNow

Education

Jul 06, 2026

Estimating Tools to Efficiently Plan and Increase Profitability

With building material prices on the rise, now is a critical time for project managers to refine their estimating strategies to optimize each build.

Advocacy

Jul 02, 2026

U.S. Declines to Renew USMCA Trade Pact

The Trump administration announced yesterday that it will not renew the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

View all

Latest Economic News

Economics

Jul 06, 2026

Top Ten Builder Market Share Falls in 2025

The top ten builders accounted for 43.6% of all new U.S. single-family home closings in 2025, down 1.2 percentage points from 2024 (44.8%), based on BUILDER magazine data.

Economics

Jul 03, 2026

Mortgage Rates Increased in June as Markets Weigh Inflation and Fed Policy

Mortgage rates continued to increase in June as markets priced in a rate hike due to high inflation and stronger-than-expected labor market.

Economics

Jul 02, 2026

U.S. Economy Adds 57,000 Jobs in June

The U.S. labor market lost momentum in June, with total nonfarm payroll employment rising by just 57,000, the smallest gain since February’s outright decline. Downward revisions to April and May payroll estimates subtracted a combined 74,000 jobs from previously reported totals, reversing the sizable upward revisions reported a month earlier and suggesting underlying hiring momentum was weaker than initially reported.