Solar or Not?
Sometimes Cost-Effectiveness is Not the Only Reason, Panelists Say

Before considering whether to add "solar-ready" capability to a new home, make sure that all the cheaper energy-efficiency improvements have already been made, said panelists at a session on solar energy at the 2013 International Builders' Show in Las Vegas.

"It's not just about reducing demand, it's about reducing demand cost-effectively," said panelist C.R. Herro, vice president of environmental affairs for Meritage Homes in Scottsdale, Ariz.

That is, of course, unless "soft costs" — such as winning over anti-NIMBY activists, convincing officials to change zoning requirements or promoting the community to potential home buyers — might be reduced with the addition of solar or other renewable energy improvements are made, they said.

But is that greenwashing? No, said panelist Donald Powers, an architect at Union Studio Architecture & Community Design in Providence, R.I. – even if it is a little cynical.

"Cost-benefit analysis makes no difference unless it translates into a sale," he said. Adding renewable energy options may give a community a higher profile and result in more sales, and that may give the builder or developer and opportunity — and the dollars and "street cred" — to build another community that's even more sustainable.

Learn more about the debate between efficiency improvements and marketability by listening to a recording of the IBS session. For information, visit the IBS Online Library.


Recommend This: Recommend This